This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Google Scholar Articles by Xun Wu, Articles by Malaluan, N. A. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

A Tale of Two Concessionaires: A Natural Experiment of Water Privatisation in Metro Manila

Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore, 469C Bukit Timah Road, Singapore 259772, sppwuxun{at}nus.edu.sg

Nepomuceno A. Malaluan

Action for Economic Reforms, 40 Matulungin Street, Central District, Quezon City, 1100 Philippines, nepo{at}aer.ph

In February 1997, Maynilad Water Services, Inc. and the Manila Water Company, Inc. were awarded concession contracts from Manila's Metropolitan Waterworks and Sewerage System (MWSS) and split between them the service areas in Metro Manila. In the years thereafter, the paths taken by the two concessionaires diverged dramatically: Maynilad became bankrupt and was turned over to MWSS, whereas Manila Water has prospered and is now a listed company in the Philippine Stock Exchange. The co-existence of two concessionaires in the same city offers a rare opportunity to study the role of internal factors in the privatisation of urban water systems because the effects of many important external factors, such as political support, regulatory structure and unforeseen events, are effectively controlled. The findings suggest that corporate governance, financial management and operations management of privatised water utilities are among the most important internal factors that determine success of water privatisation in developing countries.

References

• Bamford, J. and Ernst, D. (2005) Governing joint ventures, McKinsey on Finance, 15(Spring), pp. 12—16.
• Beer, M. and Weldon, E. (2000a) Manila Water Company (A). Harvard Business School Case 401-014, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
• Beer, M. and Weldon, E. (2000b) Manila Water Company (B). Harvard Business School Case 401—015, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
• Birdsall, N. and Nellis, J. (2002) Winners and losers: assessing the distributional impactof privatization. Working Paper No. 6, Center for Global Development (http://www.cgdev.org/).
• Black, B., Kraakman, R. and Tarasova, A. (2000) Russian privatization and corporate governance: what went wrong?, Stanford Law Review, 52, pp. 1731—1808.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Bosman, M. (2005) Review of privatization of water and sanitation systems: the case of Greater Buenos Aires. Unpublished manuscript.
• Brubaker, E. (2001) The promise of privatization. Energy Probe Research Foundation, Toronto, Ontario (http://www.environmentprobe.org/enviroprobe/pubs/Ev548.htm ) April.
• Buenaventura, M., Palattao, B. and Nacpil, L. (2004) Debt, trade and the privatization of water services: the Philippine experience. The Freedom from Debt Coalition, the Philippines.
• Chandra, M., Girard, R. and Puscas, D. (2005) Corporate profile: Suez. Polaris Institute, Ottawa, Ontario.
• Chogull, C. and Chogull, M. (1996) Towards sustainable infrastructure for low-income countries, in: C. Pugh (Ed.) Sustainability, the Environment and Urbanization, pp. 83—103. London: Earthscan.
• Chotrani, R. (1999) Lessons from Philippines water privatization, Asian Water, July.
• Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J.P.H. and Lang, L.H.P. (2002) Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings, Journal of Finance, 57, pp. 2741—2771.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Crane, R. (1994) Water markets, market reform and the urban poor: results from Jakarta, Indonesia, World Development, 22(1), pp. 71—83.[CrossRef][ISI]
• David, C. (2001) Private sector participation in water supply and sanitation: realizing social and environmental objectives in Manila, in: N. Johnstone and L. Wood (Eds) Private Firms and Public Water, pp. 117—158. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
• David, C. and Inocencio,A. (1998) Understanding household demand and supply of water: the Metro Manila case. Policy Note No. 96-04, Philippine Institute for Development Studies, Makati City.
• Diokno-Pascual, M. (2004) Lessons from the Suez—Maynilad water venture. Bantay Tubig. Unpublished manuscript.
• Dosi, C. and Easter, K.W. (2003) Market failure and role of markets and privatization in alleviating water scarcity, International Journal of Public Administration, 26(3), pp. 265—290.[CrossRef]
• Dumol, M. (2000) The Manila water concession: a key government official's diary of the world's largest water privatization. The World Bank, Washington, DC.
• Dyck, A. (2001) Privatization and corporate governance: principles, evidence, and future challenges, The World Bank Research Observer, 16(1), pp. 59—84.[Abstract]
• Esguerra, J. (2003) The corporate muddle of Manila's water concessions: how the world's biggest and most successful privatization turned into a failure. Water Aid and Institute for Popular Democracy. Unpublished manuscript.
• Esguerra, J. (2006) Manila water privatization: universal service coverage after the crisis. Unpublished manuscript.
• Estache, A. and Rossi, M. (2002) How different is the efficiency of public and private water companies in Asia?, The World Bank Economic Review, 16(1), pp. 139—148.[Abstract]
• Estache, A., Gomez-Lobo, A. and Leipziger, D. (2001) Utilities privatization and the poor: lessons and evidence from Latin America, World Development, 29(7), pp. 1179—1198.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Fabella, R. (2006) Shifting the boundary of the state: the privatization and regulation of water service in metropolitan Manila. Working Paper, Center on Regulation and Competition, School of Economics, University of the Philippines.
• Galiani, S., Gertler, P. and Schargrodsky, E. (2005) Water for life: the impact of the privatization of water services on child mortality, Journal of Political Economy, 113, pp. 83—120.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Gleick, P. (1999) The human right to water, Water Policy, 1(5), pp. 487—503.[CrossRef]
• Gleick, P., Wolff, G., Chalecki, E. and Reyes, R. (2002) The new economy of water: the risks and benefits of globalisation and privatisation of fresh water. Pacific Institute, Oakland, CA.
• Gómez-Ibáñez, J., Lorrain, D. and Osius, M. (2004) The future of private infrastructure. Working paper, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
• Haarmeyer, D. and Coy, D. (2002) An overview of private sector participation in the global and US water and wastewater sector, in: P. Seidenstat, D. Haarmeyer and S. Hakim (Eds) Reinventing Water and Wastewater Systems: Global Lessons for Improving Water Management, pp. 7—27. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
• Haarmeyer, D. and Mody, A. (1997) Tapping the private sector: approaches to managing risk in water and sanitation. Project Finance and Guarantees Department, The World Bank, Washington, DC.
• Hall, D., Corral, V., Lobina, E. and Motte, R. de la (2004) Water privatization and restructuring in Asia-Pacific. Report for Public Service International Research Unit, Greenwich, London.
• Hall, D., Lobina, E. and Motte, R. de la (2005) Public resistance to privatization in water and energy, Development in Practice, 15(3/4), pp. 286—301.[CrossRef]
• Harris, C., Hodges, J., Schur, M. and Shukla, P. (2003) Infrastructure projects: a review of canceled private projects. Public Policy for the Private Sector Note 252, The World Bank, Washington, DC.
• Hewett, P. and Montgomery, M. (2001) Poverty and public services in developing-country cities. Working Paper No. 154, Policy Research Division, Population Council, New York.
• Johnstone, N., Hearne, R. and Wood, L. (2001) Regulation of social and environmental concerns with increased private sector participation in the provision of water and sanitation, in: N. Johnstone and L. Wood (Eds) Private Firms and Public Water, pp. 21—44. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
• Kessides, I. (2004) Reforming infrastructure: privatization, regulation and competition. Policy Research Report, World Bank, Washington, DC.
• Kirkpatrick, C., Parker, D. and Zhang,Y.F. (2004) An empirical analysis of state and private-sector provision of water services in Africa, The World Bank Economic Review, 20(1), pp. 143—163.[CrossRef]
• Landingin, R. (2003) Loaves, fishes and dirty dishes: Manila's privatized water can't handle the pressure. International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, Center for Public Integrity, Washington, DC.
• Manila Water (2005) Manila Water annual report.
• Marvin, S. and Laurie, N. (1999) An emerging logic of urban water management, Cochabamba, Bolivia, Urban Studies, 36(2), pp. 341—357.
• McIntosh, A. (2003) Asian Water Supplies: Reaching the Urban Poor. Manila: Asian Development Bank.
• McIntosh,A. andYniguez, C. (Eds) (1997) Second Water Utilities Data Book: Asian and Pacific Region. Manila: Asian Development Bank.
• Nestor, S. (2005) Falling between the cracks: privatisation and corporate governance in the European telecom industry, Corporate Governance, 13(2), pp. 137—155.[CrossRef]
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (1999) OECD principles of corporate governance (http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/32/18/31557724.pdf ).
• Ogden, S. and Clarke, J. (2005) Customer disclosures, impression management and the construction of legitimacy: corporate reports in the UK privatized water industry, Accounting Auditing and Accountability Journal, 18(3), pp. 313—345.[CrossRef]
• Ozkaya, M. and Askari, H. (1999) Management of newly privatized companies: its importance and how little we know, World Development, 27, pp. 1097—1114.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Rivera, C. jr (2004) The experience of the Manila Water Company under the MWSS privatization. Paper presented at the Regional Conference on Universality of Infrastructure Services: Financing, Delivery, Legal and Regulatory Issues, India Habitat Centre, New Delhi.
• Saldana, C. (2001) Corporate governance environment and policy: their impact on corporate performance and finance in the Philippines, in: Oecd (Ed.) Corporate Governance in Asia: A Comparative Perspective, pp. 333—372. Paris: OECD.
• Santiago, C. (2002) European water corporations and the privatization of Asian water resources: the challenge for Asian water security. Monitoring Sustainability of Globalization, Kuala Lumpar, Malaysia.
• Scanlon, J., Cassar, A. and Nemes, N. (2004) Water as a human right? Paper No. 51, IUCN Environmental Policy and Law, IUCN/UNDP.
• Shirley, M. and Menard, C. (2002) Cities awash: a synthesis of the country cases, in: M. Shirley (Ed.) Thirsting for Efficiency, pp. 1—41. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
• Smith, L. and Hanson, S. (2003) Access to water for the urban poor in Cape Town: where equity meets cost recovery, Urban Studies, 40(8), pp. 1517—1548.
• UTCE and Japan PFI Association (2004) Impact evaluation study on public—private partnership. Japan Bank for International Co-operation, Tokyo.
• World Bank (2005) Philippines: meeting infrastructure challenges. Infrastructure Sector Department, East Asia and Pacific Region, The World Bank, Washington, DC.
• Wu,X. (2005) Political institutions and corporate governance reform in southeast Asia, in: K. L. Ho (Ed.) Reforming Corporate Governance in Southeast Asia: Economics, Politics and Regulation, pp. 16—37. Singapore: ISEAS.

CiteULike

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Google Scholar Articles by Xun Wu, Articles by Malaluan, N. A. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?