This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Costa-Font, J. Articles by Mascarilla-Miró, O. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

`Ageing in Place'? Exploring Elderly People's Housing Preferences in Spain

Social Policy Department, the European Institute and LSE Health, London School of Economics, Cowdray House, Houghton Street, WC2A 2AE, UK, j.costa-font{at}lse.ac.uk

David Elvira

Departament d'Economia i Impresa, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Ramon Trias Fargas 25-27, 08005 Barcelona, Spain

Oscar Mascarilla-Miró

Departament de Teoria Econòmica, Universitat de Barcelona, Torre 2, Planta 1a and 2a, Av. Diagonal 690, 08034 Barcelona, Spain

The greater visibility of societal ageing and higher share of individuals with disabilities have created new challenges for housing and urban policies. Housing needs can influence individual choice of living environment and the willingness to undertake housing improvements. This is especially relevant in southern European countries where the family is still the main provider of care for the elderly. This study makes an empirical analysis of the underlying preferences for housing and perceptions of housing suitability in the event of dependency in old age, drawing upon a new representative database of the Spanish population. It explores whether preferences are stable for different age-groups and different levels of individual affluence, calculated in terms of income and housing assets. The study found preferences for `ageing in place', which became stronger as individuals grew older. The effect of affluence, or the `wealth effect', was considerable. Acting independently and exhibiting higher health needs, it restrained individuals from choosing institutional care options. Those respondents who preferred to `age in place' were relatively less affluent. Those with relatively less formal education, preferred living with their relatives.

Urban Studies, Vol. 46, No. 2, 295-316 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0042098008099356


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?