Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Urban Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carruthers, J. I.
Right arrow Articles by Úlfarsson, G. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Does `Smart Growth' Matter to Public Finance?

John I. Carruthers

Office of Policy Development and Research, US Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street SW, Room 8226, Washington, DC 20410, USA, john.i.carruthers{at}hud.gov, National Center for Smart Growth Research and Education, the University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA

Gudmundur F. Úlfarsson

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, the University of Iceland, Hjardarhaga 6, IS-107, Reykjavik, Iceland, gfu{at}hi.is

This paper addresses four fundamental questions about the relationship between `smart growth', a fiscally motivated anti-sprawl policy movement, and public finance. Do low-density, spatially extensive land use patterns cost more to support? If so, how large an influence does sprawl actually have? How does the influence differ among types of spending? And, how does it compare with the influence of other relevant factors? The analysis, which is based on the entire continental US and uses a series of spatial econometric models to evaluate one aggregate (total direct) and nine disaggregate (education, fire protection, housing and community development, libraries, parks and recreation, police protection, roadways, sewerage, and solid waste disposal) measures of spending, provides the most detailed evidence to date of how sprawl affects the vast sum of revenue that local governments spend every year.

Urban Studies, Vol. 45, No. 9, 1791-1823 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0042098008093379


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
M. M. Edwards and Yu Xiao
Annexation, Local Government Spending, and the Complicating Role of Density
Urban Affairs Review, November 1, 2009; 45(2): 147 - 165.
[Abstract] [PDF]