This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Mathers, J. Articles by Jones, S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Exploring Resident (Non-)participation in the UK New Deal for Communities Regeneration Programme

Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK, matherjm{at}adf.bham.ac.uk

Jayne Parry

Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK, parryjm{at}adf.bham.ac.uk

Susan Jones

Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK, jonessaz{at}adf.bham.ac.uk

Current policy responses to low levels of resident participation in urban regeneration schemes may be based on flawed assumptions for the reasons underpinning non-participation amongst certain sections of disadvantaged communities. Ethnographic fieldwork in a New Deal for Communities area demonstrates that some residents actively avoid participation as part of `survival strategies' that have been developed to cope with long-term multiple disadvantage. Capacity building exercises are unlikely to impact upon participation rates among these individuals and groups. Instead, a more radical approach to social policy provision is called for, that explicitly acknowledges and understands the socio-cultural context within which residents make decisions regarding participation.

Urban Studies, Vol. 45, No. 3, 591-606 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0042098007087336


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?