Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Urban Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shearmur, R.
Right arrow Articles by Barbonne, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Intrametropolitan Employment Structure: Polycentricity, Scatteration, Dispersal and Chaos in Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver, 1996-2001

Richard Shearmur

INRS-UCS, 385 Sherbrooke east, Montreal, Quebec H2X IE3, Canada, richard.shearmur{at}ucs.inrs.ca

William Coffey

Departement de Geographie, Université de Montréal, C. P. 6128, Succursale Centre-Ville, Montreal, Quebec H3C 3J7, Canada, william.coffey{at}umontreal.ca

Christian Dube

INRS-UCS, 385 Sherbrooke east, Montreal, Quebec H2X IE3, Canada, christian.dube{at}ucs.inrs.ca

Rémy Barbonne

INRS-UCS, 385 Sherbrooke east, Montreal, Quebec H2X IE3, Canada, remy.barbonne{at}ucs.inrs.ca

There is little consensus on where and how employment is decentralising in metropolitan areas. However, a number of key processes have been brought to light, and different cities have tended to display different processes: strong CBDs, suburban polynucleation, job dispersal, scattering, edgeless cities and perhaps 'keno capitalism'. This paper explores the distribution and growth of employment at a fine spatial scale. It is shown that, at this scale, there are very dynamic processes of growth and decline throughout metropolitan areas, but that these processes are organised at a wider scale by stable employment centres and by links between these centres. The structures and processes thus revealed suggest that the spatial economy of metropolitan areas should be approached as a chaotic system. From an empirical perspective, this means that, depending on the scale of analysis and the way data are considered, polynucleation, dispersal and chaos are all observed: this may partly explain the lack of consensus in the literature. The only process not evident within Canadian cities is scattering, but this process may in fact be occurring within some areas identified as suburban employment zones.

Urban Studies, Vol. 44, No. 9, 1713-1738 (2007)
DOI: 10.1080/00420980701426640
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Urban StudHome page
A. R. Watkins
The Dynamics of Urban Economies: Melbourne 1971 to 2006
Urban Stud, July 1, 2009; 46(8): 1553 - 1576.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
R. Shearmur and B. Motte
Weak Ties that Bind: Do Commutes Bind Montreal's Central and Suburban Economies?
Urban Affairs Review, March 1, 2009; 44(4): 490 - 524.
[Abstract] [PDF]