This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Portnov, B. A. Articles by Schwartz, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Urban Growth in Nepal: Does Location Matter?

Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Management, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, Haifa, Israel 31905, portnov{at}nrem.haifa.ac.il

Madhav Adhikari

Geomatics Nepal, PO Box 3873, Kathmandu, Nepal, geomatics{at}enet.com.np

Moshe Schwartz

Social Studies Unit, Department of Man in the Desert, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, 84990, Israel, moshesc{at}bgu.ac.il

Between 1952 and 2001, the number of urban settlements in Nepal grew from 10 to 58, while their share in the country's population increased from 2.6 to 14.4 per cent. However, the spatial distribution of urban growth was uneven. To find out how this unevenness was structured, a GIS-assisted analysis matched spatial reference data (such as distances between individual municipalities and major rivers, roads, international borders and major population centres) against several socioeconomic performance indexes, such as annual population growth, per capita income and expenditures of local municipalities, telephone ownership, number of primary schools and number of industrial plants. The fastest-growing urban localities were found to be close to major population centres, to highways and to the Indian border. The rest exhibited poor socioeconomic performance.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?