Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Entwistle, T.
Right arrow Articles by Martin, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 44, No. 1, 63-79 (2007)
DOI: 10.1080/00420980601023836
© 2007 Urban Studies Journal Limited

The Dysfunctions of Markets, Hierarchies and Networks in the Meta-governance of Partnership

Tom Entwistle

Cardiff Business School, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF10 3EU, UK, entwistlet{at}cardiff.ac.uk

Gillian Bristow

School of City and Regional Planning, Cardiff University, Glamorgan Building, King Edward V Avenue, Cardiff, CF10 3WA, UK, bristowgl@ cardiff.ac.uk

Frances Hines

ESRC Centre for Business Relationships, Accountability, Sustainability and Society, Cardiff University, 55 Park Place, Cardiff, CF10 3AT, UK, HinesF{at}cardiff.ac.uk

Sophie Donaldson

School of City and Regional Planning, Cardiff University, Glamorgan Building, King Edward V Avenue, Cardiff, CF10 3WA, UK, sophie_Donaldson{at}hotmail.com

Steve Martin

Cardiff Business School, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF10 3EU, UK, martinsj{at}cardiff.ac.uk

Governments increasingly see partnerships as their delivery instrument of choice. There is disagreement, however, about how the proliferation of these institutions should be understood. One interpretation sees ungovernability, instability and unaccountability in the fragmented institutions of local governance. Another maintains that the new approaches to co-ordination have allowed for the reassertion of hierarchical control. On the basis of a theoretical exposition of the logic of co-ordination and a study of 10 partnerships in Wales, this paper presents evidence which suggests that partnerships suffer principally from the dysfunctional effects of hierarchical and market co-ordination.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Public Adm Res TheoryHome page
K. G. Provan and P. Kenis
Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness
J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., April 1, 2008; 18(2): 229 - 252.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]