Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Urban Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beard, V. A.
Right arrow Articles by Dasgupta, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Collective Action and Community-driven Development in Rural and Urban Indonesia

Victoria A. Beard

Department of Planning, Policy and Design, University of California, Irvine, Social Ecology I, Irvine, California 92697-7075, USA, vbeard{at}uci.edu

Aniruddha Dasgupta

Infrastructure Department, East Asia and Pacific Urban Development Unit, The World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA, adasgupta{at}worldbank.org

The article analyses differences in collective action in rural and urban communities that participated in a poverty alleviation project in Indonesia. It was found that the main determinants of collective action are relationships among multiscalar social, political and historical factors, internal and external to communities. Two distinct forms of collective action are also identified. The first form is based on community cohesion, stable social relationships and adherence to social hierarchy. The second form is based on a community's perception of an interdependent future and a shared desire for structural change. Both forms of collective action are effective in delivering project resources to beneficiaries; however, only the second form demonstrates potential for social transformation.

Urban Studies, Vol. 43, No. 9, 1451-1468 (2006)
DOI: 10.1080/00420980600749944


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Latin American PerspectivesHome page
C. Irazabal and J. Foley
Reflections on the Venezuelan Transition from a Capitalist Representative to a Socialist Participatory Democracy: What Are Planners to Do?
Latin American Perspectives, January 1, 2010; 37(1): 97 - 122.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
V. A. Beard and V. Basolo
Commentary: Moving Beyond Crisis, Crossroads, and the Abyss in the Disciplinary Formation of Planning
Journal of Planning Education and Research, December 1, 2009; 29(2): 233 - 242.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
COMMUNITY DEV JHome page
I. Fanany, R. Fanany, and S. Kenny
The meaning of capacity building in Indonesia
Community Dev. J., August 12, 2009; (2009) bsp044v1.
[Full Text] [PDF]