Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Urban Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glaeser, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by Gottlieb, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Urban Resurgence and the Consumer City

Edward L. Glaeser

Department of Economics, Harvard University and NBER, Littauer Center, 1875 Cambridge Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA, eglaeser{at}harvard.edu

Joshua D. Gottlieb

Taubman Center for State and Local Government, Harvard University, 79 John F. Kennedy St, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA, jdgottl{at}fas.harvard.edu

Cities make it easier for humans to interact, and one of the main advantages of dense, urban areas is that they facilitate social interactions. This paper provides evidence for the US suggesting that the resurgence of big cities in the 1990s is due, in part, to the increased demand for these interactions and due to the reduction in big city crime, which had made it difficult for urban residents to enjoy these social amenities. However, while density is correlated with consumer amenities, we show that it is not correlated with social capital and that there is no evidence that sprawl has hurt civic engagement.

Urban Studies, Vol. 43, No. 8, 1275-1299 (2006)
DOI: 10.1080/00420980600775683


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Urban StudHome page
N. M. Lewis and B. Donald
A New Rubric for 'Creative City' Potential in Canada's Smaller Cities
Urban Stud, January 1, 2010; 47(1): 29 - 54.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social ScienceHome page
I. G. Ellen and K. O'Regan
Crime and U.S. Cities: Recent Patterns and Implications
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, November 1, 2009; 626(1): 22 - 38.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
B. A. Portnov and M. Schwartz
On the Importance of the `Location Package' for Urban Growth
Urban Stud, July 1, 2009; 46(8): 1665 - 1679.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J ECON GEOGRHome page
P. Cheshire and S. Magrini
Urban growth drivers in a Europe of sticky people and implicit boundaries
J. Econ. Geogr., January 1, 2009; 9(1): 85 - 115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]