This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Sarzynski, A. Articles by Hanson, R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Testing the Conventional Wisdom about Land Use and Traffic Congestion: The More We Sprawl, the Less We Move?

George Washington Institute of Public Policy, George Washington University, 802 21st Street NW, Suite 602, Washington, DC 20052, USA. apsarzyn@ gwu.edu; hwolman{at}gwu.edu

Harold L. Wolman

George Washington Institute of Public Policy, George Washington University, 802 21st Street NW, Suite 602, Washington, DC 20052, USA. hwolman{at}gwu.edu

George Galster

College of Urban, Labor and Metropolitan Affairs, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA. aa3571{at}wayne.edu

Royce Hanson

George Washington Institute of Public Policy, George Washington University, 802 21st Street NW, Suite 602, Washington, DC 20052, USA. rhanson{at}gwu.edu

The paper explores relationships between seven dimensions of land use in 1990 and subsequent levels of three traffic congestion outcomes in 2000 for a sample of 50 large US urban areas. Multiple regression models are developed to address several methodological concerns, including reverse causation and time-lags. Controlling for prior levels of congestion and changes in an urban area's transport network and relevant demographics, it is found that: density/ continuity is positively related to subsequent roadway ADT/lane and delay per capita; housing centrality is positively related to subsequent delay per capita; and housing-job proximity is inversely related to subsequent commute time. Only the last result corresponds to the conventional wisdom that more compact metropolitan land use patterns reduce traffic congestion. These results prove two points: that the choice of congestion measure may substantively affect the results; and that multivariate statistical analyses are necessary to control for potentially confounding influences, such as population growth and investment in the transport network.

Urban Studies, Vol. 43, No. 3, 601-626 (2006)
DOI: 10.1080/00420980500452441


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Lee, P. Gordon, H. W. Richardson, and J. E. Moore II Commuting Trends in U.S. Cities in the 1990s Journal of Planning Education and Research, September 1, 2009; 29(1): 78 - 89. [Abstract] [PDF]