This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Boraine, A. Articles by Parnell, S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

The State of South African Cities a Decade after Democracy

Cape Town Partnership, The Terraces, 10th Floor, 34 Bree Street, 8001 Cape Town, South Africa

Owen Crankshaw

Department of Sociology, University of Cape Town, Private Bag Rondebosch, 7701, South Africa, crankshaw{at}humanities.uct.ac.za

Carien Engelbrecht

Cities Alliance, Postnet Suite 248, Private Bag X5, 2117 Norwood, South Africa. Fax: 011 214 2715, carien{at}aurik.co.za

Graeme Gotz

lead consultant on the 2004 Report, gotz.g{at}worldonline.co.za

Sithole Mbanga

time of the SACN launch and is in Johannesburg

Monty Narsoo

SA Cities Network, 158 Loveday Street, A Block, 16th Floor, Johannesburg Metro Building, Braamfontein, South Africa, sithole{at}sacities.net

Susan Parnell

Department of Geography, University of Cape Town, Private Bag Rondebosch, 7701, South Africa, pamell{at}enviro.uct.ac.za

Like other national urban policy documents, the State of the Cities Report 2004 affirms a vision of an inclusive non-racial city in which democracy is stable and development flourishes. But the 2004 report is different from preceding urban policy statements in a number of critical respects, not least that it is not a formal statement of government. In part, the relative autonomy of the Report's sponsor, the South African Cities Network (a quango of state and non-state affiliates), explains its divergent analytical point of departure in the assessment of the state of the cities 10 years after democracy. The 2004 report is premised on the notion that changing the racial pattern of inequality hinges on systematic responses to the material forces, demographic, economic, environmental and institutional, that shaped the inherited apartheid city form. The 2004 report is also different from earlier government policy positions in that it argues that urban development is not just a site of national reconstruction and development, but that the urban question lies at the heart of achieving the national vision of a productive, democratic and non-racial society based on a vision of sustainable human settlements.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?