Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lawless, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 43, No. 11, 1991-2011 (2006)
DOI: 10.1080/00420980600897859
© 2006 Urban Studies Journal Limited

Area-based Urban Interventions: Rationale and Outcomes: The New Deal for Communities Programme in England

Paul Lawless

Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research, Sheffield Hallam University, City Campus, Pond Street, Sheffield, S1 1WB, UK, p.l.lawless{at}shu.ac.uk

It is now 40 years since the first area-based initiative (ABI) was launched in England. New Deal for Communities (NDC), announced in 1998, is one of the most ambitious of English ABIs in that it aims, over a period of 10 years, to reduce the gaps between 39 deprived areas and national standards in five outcome areas: crime, education, health, worklessness, and housing and the physical environment. Change data from the 2001-05 national evaluation are used to explore three considerations: change across the programme; drivers of mobility; and change at the partnership level. Barriers operating at the neighbourhood, city-wide and national levels have impacted on the implementation of the programme.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Public Policy and AdministrationHome page
S. Pemberton
Social Inclusion and the `Get Heard' Process: Implications for the Horizontal and Vertical Integration of Governance and Policy in the UK
Public Policy and Administration, April 1, 2008; 23(2): 127 - 143.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Public Policy and AdministrationHome page
J. Coaffee and I. Deas
The Search for Policy Innovation in Urban Governance: Lessons from Community-led Regeneration Partnerships
Public Policy and Administration, April 1, 2008; 23(2): 167 - 187.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Cambridge J Regions Econ SocHome page
B. Jordan
The place of 'place' in theories of poverty: mobility, social capital and well-being
Cambridge J Regions Econ Soc, April 1, 2008; 1(1): 115 - 129.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]