This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Purcell, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Urban Democracy and the Local Trap

Department of Urban Design and Planning, University of Washington, 410 Gould Hall, Box 355740 Seattle, Washington, WA 98195-5740, USA., mpurcell{at}u.washington.edu

This paper argues against the local trap-the tendency to assume that the local scale is preferable to other scales. The local trap is an important problem in the recent explosion of research on urban democracy and citizenship. The paper highlights one strain of that literature, the work on 'the right to the city'. It is argued that the right to the city is highly susceptible to the local trap, although it is not inherently so. As we continue to search for innovative new ideas like the right to the city that can help to democratise cities, it is critical to think carefully and strategically about scale.

Urban Studies, Vol. 43, No. 11, 1921-1941 (2006)
DOI: 10.1080/00420980600897826


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Purcell Resisting Neoliberalization: Communicative Planning or Counter-Hegemonic Movements? Planning Theory, May 1, 2009; 8(2): 140 - 165. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Cummins Commentary: Investigating neighbourhood effects on health--avoiding the 'Local Trap' Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2007; 36(2): 355 - 357. [Full Text] [PDF]