|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
The Artistic Dividend: Urban Artistic Specialisation and Economic Development Implications
Ann Markusen
Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota, 301 S. 19th Avenue, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA, markusen{at}umn.edu
Greg Schrock
Centre for Urban Economic Development, University of Illinois Chicago, 322 S. Green Street, Chicago, IL 60607-3555, USA, gschro2{at}uic.edu
Over the past two decades, urban and regional policy-makers have increasingly looked to the arts and culture as an economic panacea, especially for the older urban core. The arts' regional economic contribution is generally measured by totalling the revenue of larger arts organisations, associated expenditures by patrons and multiplier effects. This approach underestimates the contributions of creative artists to a regional economy, because of high rates of self-employment and direct export activity, because artists' work enhances the design, production and marketing of products and services in other sectors and because artists induce innovation on the part of suppliers. Artists create import-substituting entertainment options for regional consumers and spend large shares of their own incomes on local arts output. The paper takes a labour-centred view of the arts economy, hypothesising that many artists choose a locale in which to work, often without regard to particular employers but in response to a nurturing artistic and patron community, amenities and affordable cost of living. Because evidence on such economic impacts and location calculus is impossible to document directly, the distribution of artists across the largest US metropolitan areas is used as a proxy, using data from the PUMS for 1980, 1990 and 2000. It is found that artists sort themselves out among American cities in irregular fashion, not closely related to either size or growth rates. The paper further explores variations in the definition of artist, the relationship between artistic occupation and industry, and differentials in artists' self-employment rates and earnings across cities. It is concluded that artists comprise a relatively footloose group that can serve as a target of regional and local economic development policy; the components of such a policy are outlined.
Urban Studies, Vol. 43, No. 10,
1661-1686 (2006)
DOI: 10.1080/00420980600888478

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Yoon and E. J. Malecki
Cartoon planet: worlds of production and global production networks in the animation industry
Ind. Corp. Change,
September 7, 2009;
(2009)
dtp040v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Currid and S. Williams
The geography of buzz: art, culture and the social milieu in Los Angeles and New York
J. Econ. Geogr.,
July 21, 2009;
(2009)
lbp032v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Florida and C. Mellander
There goes the metro: how and why bohemians, artists and gays affect regional housing values
J. Econ. Geogr.,
July 8, 2009;
(2009)
lbp022v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Currid
Bohemia as Subculture; "Bohemia" as Industry: Art, Culture, and Economic Development
Journal of Planning Literature,
May 1, 2009;
23(4):
368 - 382.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Reimer
Geographies of production II: fashion, creativity and fragmented labour
Progress in Human Geography,
February 1, 2009;
33(1):
65 - 73.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Gill and A. Pratt
In the Social Factory?: Immaterial Labour, Precariousness and Cultural Work
Theory Culture Society,
December 1, 2008;
25(7-8):
1 - 30.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. P. H. Poon and C. A. Lai
Why are Non-profit Performing Arts Organisations Successful in Mid-sized US Cities?
Urban Stud,
October 1, 2008;
45(11):
2273 - 2289.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Florida, C. Mellander, and K. Stolarick
Inside the black box of regional development--human capital, the creative class and tolerance
J. Econ. Geogr.,
September 1, 2008;
8(5):
615 - 649.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. C. Kloosterman
Walls and bridges: knowledge spillover between 'superdutch' architectural firms
J. Econ. Geogr.,
July 1, 2008;
8(4):
545 - 563.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|