Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sajor, E. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 42, No. 8, 1321-1343 (2005)
DOI: 10.1080/00420980500150656
© 2005 Urban Studies Journal Limited

Professionalisation or Hybridisation? Real Estate Brokers in Metro Cebu, the Philippines, during the Boom of the 1990s

Edsel E. Sajor

School of Environment, Resources and Development, Asian Institute of Technology (AIT), Km. 42, Paholyothin Highway, Klong Luang, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand, esajor{at}ait.ac.th

This paper addresses a gap in the literature about the effect of the late 20th-century property boom on real estate practitioners in a developing country city in the context of enhanced global integration. Taking a process approach, it examines professionalisation within the brokers' sector in Metro Cebu, the Philippines, by pairing theories on the sociology of professions on one hand and insights from economic sociology and studies of globalisation and local transformations on the other. It is argued that professionalisation initiated by local realtor boards and, to a certain degree, supported by major national property firms with international partners was a social closure, creating opportunities for monopoly for the licensed brokers, while marginalising the unlicensed. As part of their strategy, its advocates employed delegitimising discourses. Certain historical and locality-specific factors, however, seriously constrained it-namely: state weakness in bureaucratic regulation, the indispensability of local knowledge in brokering, the dominant bargaining characteristics of land transactions and clients' greater power in the market over licensed providers. What flourished instead were hybridised brokering networks and partnerships comprised of both professional and unlicensed agents, demonstrating the point that there is nothing intrinsically incompatible between informality, modernisation and a high-performing property market.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?