This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Cheshire, P. Articles by Sheppard, S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Introduction of Price Signals into Land Use Planning Decision-making: A Proposal

Department of Geography and Environment, London School of Economics, London, WC2A 2AE, UK, P.Cheshire{at}lse.ac.uk

Stephen Sheppard

Department of Economics, Fernald House, Williams College, Williamstown, MA 01267, USA, Stephen.C.Sheppard{at}williams.edu

Although directed to the British system of town and country planning this paper has relevance for many OECD countries, including some with systems of land use regulation which evolved entirely independently of the British. The paper starts by characterising the basic features of the British land use planning system, viewed from the resource allocation point of view of an economist. A conclusion is that the system explicitly excludes any use of price signals from its decisions. The paper then summarises the problems to which the exclusion of price information has given rise. Because the UK planning system has deliberately constrained the supply of space, and space is an attribute of housing which is income elastic in demand, rising incomes not only drive rising real house prices but also mean that land prices have risen considerably faster than house prices. Several housing attributes other than garden space are to a degree substitutes for land but the underlying cause of the inelastic supply of housing in the UK is the constraint on land supply. The final section proposes a mechanism which would make use of the information embodied in the price premiums of neighbouring parcels of land zoned for different uses. Such premiums signal the relative scarcity of land for different uses at each location and should become a 'material consideration' in planning decision-making. If they were above some threshold, this should provide a presumption of development unless maintaining the land in its current use could be shown to be in the public interest. If combined with impact fees, such a change would not only make housing supply more elastic and the system more transparent, but would help to distance land availability decisions from the political process.

Urban Studies, Vol. 42, No. 4, 647-663 (2005)
DOI: 10.1080/00420980500060210


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Cheshire Reflections on the nature and policy implications of planning restrictions on housing supply. Discussion of 'Planning policy, planning practice, and housing supply' by Kate Barker Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy, March 1, 2008; 24(1): 50 - 58. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Leunig and H. Overman Spatial patterns of development and the British housing market Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy, March 1, 2008; 24(1): 59 - 78. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]