This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bickerstaff, K. Articles by Walker, G. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Shared Visions, Unholy Alliances: Power, Governance and Deliberative Processes in Local Transport Planning

Centre for Environmental Risk (CER), School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK, K.Bicker.rtaff{at}uea.ac.uk

Gordon Walker

Department of Geography, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YB, UK, g.p.walker{at}lancaster.ac.uk

The aim of this paper is to bring some critical reflection to bear on the upsurge of participatory rhetoric in local governance. The research discussed investigates two case studies of deliberative exercises used by local authorities to develop their local transport plans. The analysis avoids the rather simplistic 'check list' evaluative models based upon the Habermasian ideals of communicative rationality and instead develops an approach which attends to the power relations embedded in the process of participation. Significantly, the research, across a range of stakeholder groups, reveals a deeply problematic relationship between citizen involvement and established structures of democratic decision-making. Attention is drawn to the institutional constraints which account for the limited realisation of the participatory agenda in local governance. Conclusions are also developed relating to both the process of participation evaluation and the wider consequences of the expansion of public involvement for the renewal of local democracy.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?