This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Moulaert, F. Articles by Ailenei, O. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Social Economy, Third Sector and Solidarity Relations: A Conceptual Synthesis from History to Present

Global Urban Research Unit (GURU), University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NE1 7RU, UK, CNRS-IFRESI, France, frank.moulaert{at}ncl.ac.uk

Oana Ailenei

Economie Industrielle, University of Lille I, France, Oana.Ailenei{at}ed.univ-lillel.fr

This paper attempts to provide a clear perspective on defining the social economy today. It addresses the question of the relevance of a unifying concept with its need to embrace the existing diversity of approaches and concepts. To this end, it surveys both historical and contemporary academic literature, as well as practice-rooted conceptualisations of the social economy. The first section outlines the analytical challenges to a reconstruction of the social economy concept. The second enhances the historical and space-bound diversity in theorising and institutionalising social economy practices. Section 3 focuses on contemporary reconceptualisations of the social economy in Francophone and Anglo-Saxon literature, while section 4 then suggests improvements to current 'social economy' concepts, by linking them to both the lessons of history and the views of social economy practitioners today.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Haugh and M. Kitson The Third Way and the third sector: New Labour's economic policy and the social economy Camb. J. Econ., November 1, 2007; 31(6): 973 - 994. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]