Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Novy, A.
Right arrow Articles by Leubolt, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 42, No. 11, 2023-2036 (2005)
DOI: 10.1080/00420980500279828
© 2005 Urban Studies Journal Limited

Participatory Budgeting in Porto Alegre: Social Innovation and the Dialectical Relationship of State and Civil Society

Andreas Novy

Department of City and Regional Development, Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration, Rossauer Lände 23/3 floor, 1090 Vienna, Austria, Andreas.novy@ wu-wien.ac.at

Bernhard Leubolt

Department of City and Regional Development, Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration, Rossauer Lände 23/3 floor, 1090 Vienna, Austria, leu{at}gmx.at

This article focuses on the identification and role of social innovation in urban development. The aim is to further the understanding of the contradictory relationship between state and civil society, using a thorough analysis of the process of participatory budgeting in Porto Alegre, the capital city of Rio Grande do Sul—the most southern state of Brazil. The first section spells out four different concepts of the relationship between state and civil society and their implications for social innovation. In the second section, these popular movements are shown to be embedded in the historically rooted structure of patrimonialism and capitalism in Brazil. The third section provides an historical analysis of Brazilian popular movements which represent new key actors in civil society. The fourth section offers a detailed description of the process of the participatory budget. In the final section, conclusions are drawn about social innovation in local politics, focusing on the empowering experiments with new public and democratic forms of the local state accessible to civil society and its interests.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
European Urban and Regional StudiesHome page
A. Novy and E. Hammer
Radical Innovation in the Era of Liberal Governance: The Case of Vienna
European Urban and Regional Studies, July 1, 2007; 14(3): 210 - 222.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Punishment SocietyHome page
D. R. Gordon
Public-empowering justice: Arguments from effectiveness, legitimacy and democracy, and the South African case
Punishment Society, January 1, 2007; 9(1): 49 - 66.
[Abstract] [PDF]