This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Swyngedouw, E. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Governance Innovation and the Citizen: The Janus Face of Governance-beyond-the-State

School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Mansfield Road, Oxford, OX1 3TB, UK, erik.swyngedouw{at}geog.ox.ac.uk

This paper focuses on the fifth dimension of social innovation-i.e. political governance. Although largely neglected in the mainstream 'innovation' literature, innovative governance arrangements are increasingly recognised as potentially significant terrains for fostering inclusive development processes. International organisations like the EU and the World Bank, as well as leading grass-roots movements, have pioneered new and more participatory governance arrangements as a pathway towards greater inclusiveness. Indeed, over the past two decades or so, a range of new and often innovative institutional arrangements has emerged, at a variety of geographical scales. These new institutional 'fixes' have begun to challenge traditional state-centred forms of policy-making and have generated new forms of governance-beyond-the-state. Drawing on Foucault's notion of governmentality, the paper argues that the emerging innovative horizontal and networked arrangements of governance-beyond-the-state are decidedly Janus-faced. While enabling new forms of participation and articulating the state-civil society relationships in potentially democratising ways, there is also a flip side to the process. To the extent that new governance arrangements rearticulate the state-civil society relationship, they also redefine and reposition the meaning of (political) citizenship and, consequently, the nature of democracy itself. The first part of the paper outlines the contours of governance-beyond-the-state. The second part addresses the thorny issues of the state-civil society relationship in the context of the emergence of the new governmentality associated with governance-beyond-the-state. The third part teases out the contradictory way in which new arrangements of governance have created new institutions and empowered new actors, while disempowering others. It is argued that this shift from 'government' to 'governance' is associated with the consolidation of new technologies of government, on the one hand, and with profound restructuring of the parameters of political democracy on the other, leading to a substantial democratic deficit. The paper concludes by suggesting that socially innovative arrangements of governance-beyond-the-state are fundamentally Janus-faced, particularly under conditions in which the democratic character of the political sphere is increasingly eroded by the encroaching imposition of market forces that set the 'rules of the game'.

Urban Studies, Vol. 42, No. 11, 1991-2006 (2005)
DOI: 10.1080/00420980500279869


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I. Breda-Vazquez, P. Conceicao, and R. Fernandes Partnership Diversity and Governance Culture: Evidence from Urban Regeneration Policies in Portugal Urban Stud, September 1, 2009; 46(10): 2213 - 2238. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Rosen and E. Razin The Rise of Gated Communities in Israel: Reflections on Changing Urban Governance in a Neo-liberal Era Urban Stud, July 1, 2009; 46(8): 1702 - 1722. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. D Davila Being a mayor: the view from four Colombian cities Environment and Urbanization, April 1, 2009; 21(1): 37 - 57. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Brownill and J. Carpenter Governance and `Integrated' Planning: The Case of Sustainable Communities in the Thames Gateway, England Urban Stud, February 1, 2009; 46(2): 251 - 274. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Benit-Gbaffou, S. Didier, and M. Morange Communities, the Private Sector, and the State: Contested Forms of Security Governance in Cape Town and Johannesburg Urban Affairs Review, May 1, 2008; 43(5): 691 - 717. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. P. Russo, L. van den Berg, and M. Lavanga Toward a Sustainable Relationship between City and University: A Stakeholdership Approach Journal of Planning Education and Research, December 1, 2007; 27(2): 199 - 216. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Novy and E. Hammer Radical Innovation in the Era of Liberal Governance: The Case of Vienna European Urban and Regional Studies, July 1, 2007; 14(3): 210 - 222. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Taylor Community Participation in the Real World: Opportunities and Pitfalls in New Governance Spaces Urban Stud, February 1, 2007; 44(2): 297 - 317. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J.W.R. Whitehand and N.J. Morton The Fringe-belt Phenomenon and Socioeconomic Change Urban Stud, October 1, 2006; 43(11): 2047 - 2066. [Abstract] [PDF]