Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gruis, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 42, No. 10, 1771-1794 (2005)
DOI: 10.1080/00420980500231696
© 2005 Urban Studies Journal Limited

Financial and Social Returns in Housing Asset Management: Theory and Dutch Housing Associations' Practice

Vincent Gruis

Department of Real Estate and Housing, Faculty of Architecture, Delft University of Technology, PO Box 5043, NL 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands, v.gruis{at}bk.tudelft.nl

This paper discusses how financial and social returns can be measured in relation to asset management in Dutch housing associations. The potential applications of performance measurement in housing asset management are assessed as well as the indicators that can be used to measure financial and social returns. An explorative survey among Dutch housing associations indicates that practice is poorly developed. As far as the measurement of financial return is concerned, a few associations operate in accordance with the theoretical 'ideal'. However, many of them still follow a traditional book-keeping approach, which is unsuitable for supporting asset management decisions. As far as social return is concerned, the survey indicates that, although associations collect a lot of data, they do not really evaluate their performance by comparing their output against pre-set targets or benchmarks. The poorly developed evaluation of performance makes it difficult for housing associations to achieve the various objectives offered by performance measurement within their own asset management. This, in turn, hampers both internal and external accountability, raises questions about the impact of municipal performance agreements and indicates that housing associations are not actively striving to use their financial surpluses in the interest of housing.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?