Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hubbard, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 41, No. 9, 1687-1702 (2004)
DOI: 10.1080/0042098042000243101

Cleansing the Metropolis: Sex Work and the Politics of Zero Tolerance

Phil Hubbard

Department of Geography, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE11 3TU, UK, P.J.Hubbard{at}lboro.ac.uk

Although red-light districts have long been characteristic features of Western cities, these spaces are periodically subject to forms of moral cleansing and purification enacted by the state and law. Focusing on central Paris and the West End of London, this paper describes recent 'Zero Tolerance' policies designed to displace sex work from such spaces. Exploring the motives for such actions, the paper argues that policy-makers are seeking to demonstrate their ability to assert moral order by reclaiming red-light districts from sex workers. Simultaneously, it is suggested that this process of 'purification' is intended to maximise the potential for capital accumulation in city centres via the promotion of family-oriented gentrification. The paper concludes by thinking through the implications of this, posing the question: is it right that sex workers are being excluded from our city centres?


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
SociologyHome page
J. Donoghue
Antisocial Behaviour Orders (ASBOs) in Britain: Contextualizing Risk and Reflexive Modernization
Sociology, April 1, 2008; 42(2): 337 - 355.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal JusticeHome page
T. Sagar
Tackling on-street sex work: Anti-social behaviour orders, sex workers and inclusive inter-agency initiatives
JCriminology and Criminal Justice, May 1, 2007; 7(2): 153 - 168.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
A. Ryder
The Changing Nature of Adult Entertainment Districts: Between a Rock and a Hard Place or Going from Strength to Strength?
Urban Stud, August 1, 2004; 41(9): 1659 - 1686.
[Abstract] [PDF]