Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simmie, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 41, No. 5-6, 1095-1112 (2004)
DOI: 10.1080/00420980410001675823

Innovation and Clustering in the Globalised International Economy

James Simmie

School of Planning, Oxford Brookes University, Gipsy Lane, Headington, Oxford OX3 OBP, UK, jsimmie{at}brookes.ac.uk

In this paper, it is argued that innovation is the key driver of competitiveness and productivity. Innovation is an internationally distributed system of activities and therefore geographically localised and clustered firms are likely to form only a limited set of the total actors engaged in such a system. Where Porter's concept of clusters is used to describe mainly localised economic interactions it is not therefore likely to contribute much to an understanding of the relationships between innovation and economic growth. On the other hand, when the concept is applied to trading nodes in the global economy it is more likely to incorporate the international linkages between suppliers, producers and customers that are a key characteristic of the most innovative firms. The paper focuses on Porter's main arguments concerning the relationships between innovation and clustering. The vagueness of his analysis of the geography of clusters is highlighted. Nevertheless, following his argument that trading clusters are the key to economic growth, the analysis focuses on the nature and extent of linkages and in particular their contribution to innovation. Evidence from previous studies is used to suggest that national and international linkages and networks are just as significant as their local counterparts for firms in the UK. Evidence from the third Community Innovation Survey is used to test four of Porter's six hypotheses concerning the contribution of clustering to innovation. All of them are shown to benefit from national and international linkages and collaboration.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ECON GEOGRHome page
R. C. Kloosterman
Walls and bridges: knowledge spillover between 'superdutch' architectural firms
J. Econ. Geogr., July 1, 2008; 8(4): 545 - 563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cambridge J Regions Econ SocHome page
P. McCann
Globalization and economic geography: the world is curved, not flat
Cambridge J Regions Econ Soc, June 23, 2008; (2008) rsn002v3.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]