This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Benneworth, P. Articles by Henry, N. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Where Is the Value Added in the Cluster Approach? Hermeneutic Theorising, Economic Geography and Clusters as a Multiperspectival Approach

Centre for Urban and Regional Development Studies, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK, paul.benneworth{at}ncl.ac.uk

Nick Henry

Centre for Urban and Regional Development Studies, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK, nick.henry{at}ncl.ac.uk

Barnes has argued that (new) economic geography has moved in to a phase of theory development that he describes as 'hermeneutic' theorising. This epistemological position is characterised by an interpretive, reflexive and open-ended mode of inquiry that recognises the diversity of sources available for theorising and the subsequent conversations that will ensue from such diversity. In a recent deconstruction of the clusters concept in economic geography, and especially that version (or brand) expounded by Michael Porter, Martin and Sunley ask the question as to what added value is delivered by the concept's gatecrashing of academic and policy debates. This paper argues that clusters should not be overendowed as a singular 'brand', but recognised as an emergent set of multiple perspectives in dialogue. From a position of hermeneutic theorising, 'clusters' have the potential to add value by allowing theoretical debate across a wide range of (overlapping and competing) perspectives whose partiality and situatedness are made explicit. The possibilities for theoretical, empirical and policy cross-fertilisation from the difficult act of holding together these threads is one potential drawn from the conversations engendered through hermeneutic theorising in economic geography. Nevertheless, this 'work in progress' must be deepened and extended if the potential of clusters is to be realised.

Urban Studies, Vol. 41, No. 5-6, 1011-1023 (2004)
DOI: 10.1080/00420980410001675869


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. van Heur The Clustering of Creative Networks: Between Myth and Reality Urban Stud, July 1, 2009; 46(8): 1531 - 1552. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Chaminade and J. Vang Upgrading in Asian Clusters: Rethinking the Importance of Interactive Learning Science Technology and Society, May 1, 2008; 13(1): 61 - 94. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Intarakumnerd and J. Vang Clusters and Innovation Systems in Asia Science Technology and Society, March 1, 2006; 11(1): 1 - 7. [PDF]

				H. Bathelt Geographies of production: growth regimes in spatial perspective (II) - knowledge creation and growth in clusters Progress in Human Geography, April 1, 2005; 29(2): 204 - 216. [PDF]