Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harrison, C.M.
Right arrow Articles by Collins, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 41, No. 4, 903-917 (2004)
DOI: 10.1080/0042098042000194179

Experimental Discursive Spaces: Policy Processes, Public Participation and the Greater London Authority

C.M. Harrison

Environment and Society Research Unit (ESRU), Department of Geography, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London, WCIH OAP, UK, c.harrison{at}geog.ucl.ac.uk

R.J.C. Munton

Environment and Society Research Unit (ESRU), Department of Geography, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London, WCIH OAP, UK, r.munton{at}geog.ucl.ac.uk

K. Collins

Faculty of Technology, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK, K.B.Collins{at}open.ac.uk

The paper seeks to engage with the interrelationships between the newly established Greater London Authority (GLA) as a form of devolved but diffuse city governance and new procedures for encouraging active public engagement in policy-making processes. The scope and conduct of new discursive spaces for engaging Londoners in the early stages of policy-making concerned with sustainable development are the focus of enquiry. The paper draws on published sources and a series of in-depth interviews conducted with officers, advisers and elected members of the GLA. Theories and practices of deliberative democracy provide the basis for assessing to what extent these experimental discursive spaces supported the pursuit of a collaborative approach to decision-making.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Urban StudHome page
A. Thornley, Y. Rydin, K. Scanlon, and K. West
Business Privilege and the Strategic Planning Agenda of the Greater London Authority
Urban Stud, October 1, 2005; 42(11): 1947 - 1968.
[Abstract] [PDF]