This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by McDonald, J. F. Articles by McMillen, D. P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Determinants of Suburban Development Controls: A Fischel Expedition

Center for Urban Real Estate (MC 144), College of Business Administration, University of Illinois at Chicago, 601 S. Morgan Street, Chicago, IL 60607, USA, mcdonald{at}uic.edu

Daniel P. McMillen

Center for Urban Real Estate (MC 144), College of Business Administration, University of Illinois at Chicago, 601 S. Morgan Street, Chicago, IL 60607, USA, mcmillere{at}uic.edu

In addition to land-use zoning, development controls in the suburban municipalities of metropolitan Chicago include architectural reviews, appearance regulations, historical preservation areas, enterprise zones, tax-increment financing districts, development impact fees and regulations pertaining to group homes, mobile homes, factory-assembled homes and adult uses. Results of a factor analysis imply that development control policies tend to cluster into quality development regulations, regulations aimed at lower-class development and growth controls. Subsequent econometric analysis suggests that larger suburbs make greater use of nearly all types of development control. Suburbs with new housing and high median household incomes tend to have complex single-family zoning provisions. Suburbs with lower incomes, larger minority populations and greater poverty rates are more likely to use Enterprise Zones and TIF districts, have more complex zoning for apartment buildings and tend not to have development impact fees.

Urban Studies, Vol. 41, No. 2, 341-361 (2004)
DOI: 10.1080/0042098032000165280


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Schmidt From Pro-Growth to Slow-Growth in Suburban New Jersey Journal of Planning Education and Research, March 1, 2008; 27(3): 306 - 318. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. R. Ihlanfeldt Exclusionary Land-use Regulations within Suburban Communities: A Review of the Evidence and Policy Prescriptions Urban Stud, February 1, 2004; 41(2): 261 - 283. [Abstract] [PDF]