Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McDonald, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by McMillen, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 41, No. 2, 341-361 (2004)
DOI: 10.1080/0042098032000165280

Determinants of Suburban Development Controls: A Fischel Expedition

John F. McDonald

Center for Urban Real Estate (MC 144), College of Business Administration, University of Illinois at Chicago, 601 S. Morgan Street, Chicago, IL 60607, USA, mcdonald{at}uic.edu

Daniel P. McMillen

Center for Urban Real Estate (MC 144), College of Business Administration, University of Illinois at Chicago, 601 S. Morgan Street, Chicago, IL 60607, USA, mcmillere{at}uic.edu

In addition to land-use zoning, development controls in the suburban municipalities of metropolitan Chicago include architectural reviews, appearance regulations, historical preservation areas, enterprise zones, tax-increment financing districts, development impact fees and regulations pertaining to group homes, mobile homes, factory-assembled homes and adult uses. Results of a factor analysis imply that development control policies tend to cluster into quality development regulations, regulations aimed at lower-class development and growth controls. Subsequent econometric analysis suggests that larger suburbs make greater use of nearly all types of development control. Suburbs with new housing and high median household incomes tend to have complex single-family zoning provisions. Suburbs with lower incomes, larger minority populations and greater poverty rates are more likely to use Enterprise Zones and TIF districts, have more complex zoning for apartment buildings and tend not to have development impact fees.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
S. Schmidt
From Pro-Growth to Slow-Growth in Suburban New Jersey
Journal of Planning Education and Research, March 1, 2008; 27(3): 306 - 318.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
K. R. Ihlanfeldt
Exclusionary Land-use Regulations within Suburban Communities: A Review of the Evidence and Policy Prescriptions
Urban Stud, February 1, 2004; 41(2): 261 - 283.
[Abstract] [PDF]