This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Latham, A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Urbanity, Lifestyle and Making Sense of the New Urban Cultural Economy: Notes from Auckland, New Zealand

Department of Geography, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK, a.latham{at}soton.ac.uk

Contemporary urban theory is marked by a division. Urban policy practitioners, planners, architects and town hall administrators have over the past two decades rediscovered an enthusiasm and belief in urban life—as indeed have significant numbers of ordinary citizens. It might have been expected that urban critics from the left would be enthusiastic about this rediscovered urbanity. In fact, the much-vaunted urban renaissance has been robustly criticised by academic urbanists, particularly by those working from within a political economy framework, as little more than elite propaganda. Rather than being defined by a renaissance, the contemporary urban landscape is almost uniquely riven by social divisions. In many ways, the critique offered by academic urbanists is powerful and convincing. But this paper argues that the academic—or urban political economy—critique of the contemporary urban condition comes at too high a price. Recognising the pervasiveness of many of the more destructive trends highlighted by the urban political economists, there is also a need to engage more positively with the broader contemporary enthusiasm for the city. Through a case study of a site in Auckland, New Zealand, the paper seeks to demonstrate how thinking carefully about both the context and the emergence of particular kinds of spaces and types of social practices associated with specific instances of urban change, can help us engage more productively with the current resurgence of interest in urban culture and cities.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. O'Neill, R. Campbell, P. Hubbard, J. Pitcher, and J. Scoular Living with the Other: Street sex work, contingent communities and degrees of tolerance Crime Media Culture, April 1, 2008; 4(1): 73 - 93. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Jayne, G. Valentine, and S. L. Holloway Geographies of alcohol, drinking and drunkenness: a review of progress Progress in Human Geography, April 1, 2008; 32(2): 247 - 263. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Bell The hospitable city: social relations in commercial spaces Progress in Human Geography, February 1, 2007; 31(1): 7 - 22. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Latham Euro-commentary: Berlin and Everywhere Else: A Reply to Allan Cochrane European Urban and Regional Studies, October 1, 2006; 13(4): 377 - 379. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Latham Euro-Commentary: Anglophone Urban Studies and the European City: Some Comments on Interpreting Berlin European Urban and Regional Studies, January 1, 2006; 13(1): 88 - 92. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Miles Understanding the Cultural 'Case': Class, Identity and the Regeneration of NewcastleGateshead Sociology, December 1, 2005; 39(5): 1019 - 1028. [PDF]