Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Englund, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 40, No. 5-6, 937-952 (2003)
DOI: 10.1080/0042098032000074254
© 2003 Urban Studies Journal Limited

Taxing Residential Housing Capital

Peter Englund

Department of Finance, Stockholm School of Economics and in the Stockholm Institute for Financial Research, Wallingatan 11, SE-111 60, Stockholm, Sweden, peter.englund{at}sifr.org

This paper discusses the main aspects of the taxation of housing drawing on general principles of optimal taxation. It focuses on the role of the property tax in achieving neutrality between rental and owner-occupied housing. Assuming that landlords are taxed according to a neutral profits tax, it follows that the property tax should be based on the rate of interest. The paper discusses how the tax rate could be adjusted to account for the lack of effective taxation of capital gains, the double taxation of dividends and the differences in the cost of labour between rental and owner-occupied housing. In most OECD countries, the combined effect of the different housing taxes amounts to a tax subsidy to owner-occupied housing. It is demonstrated how this subsidy has been reduced in Sweden—as in many other countries—in the past decade as a result of tax reforms and a lower rate of inflation. The subsidy has effects on consumption patterns, saving, capital accumulation, the distribution of welfare across generations and the allocation of risks. The paper provides a brief overview of the literature, trying to quantify some of these effects. Finally, a number of problems are noted in the practical application of a property tax.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?