This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Saito, A. Articles by Thornley, A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Shifts in Tokyo's World City Status and the Urban Planning Response

Planning Studies Programme, Department of Geography and Environment, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London, WC2 2AE, UK. A.Saito{at}lse.ac.uk

Andy Thornley

Planning Studies Programme, Department of Geography and Environment, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London, WC2 2AE, UK. A.Thorneley{at}lse.ac.uk

The position of a city in any hierarchy of world importance is not a static phenomenon. This paper takes the example of Tokyo and explores its interaction with the dramatic economic and political events in Japan over the past 20 years. Although Tokyo is widely regarded as one of the top three 'world cities', the argument is supported that it retained many national characteristics, partly based on its location in a 'developmental state'. As national fortunes have changed, so has Tokyo's relationship with its global environment. The paper focuses on strategic urban policy and the way that this reflects Tokyo's world role, as perceived by national and city governments. Three phases in approach are identified since the 1980s. Twenty years ago Japan was experiencing economic boom and this was reflected in dramatic development projects in Tokyo. The concept of 'world city' was used at this time to legitimise such development. The 1990s were viewed in Japan as 'the lost decade' with great uncertainty over policy direction as the boom collapsed and urban policy in Tokyo entered a phase of inertia. It is argued that the city is now entering a third phase in which a new competitive attitude is emerging regarding the role of Tokyo and this is leading to changes in strategic urban policy. However, this new approach is still embedded in old structures and conceptions and hence there are tensions in developing future policy.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Fulong Wu and Jingxing Zhang Planning the Competitive City-Region: The Emergence of Strategic Development Plan in China Urban Affairs Review, May 1, 2007; 42(5): 714 - 740. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K.-h. Shin and M. Timberlake Korea's Global City: Structural and Political Implications of Seoul's Ascendance in the Global Urban Hierarchy International Journal of Comparative Sociology, April 1, 2006; 47(2): 145 - 173. [Abstract] [PDF]