Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neo, P. H.
Right arrow Articles by Ong, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 40, No. 13, 2643-2660 (2003)
DOI: 10.1080/0042098032000146821
© 2003 Urban Studies Journal Limited

Government Policies and Household Mobility Behaviour in Singapore

Poh Har Neo

Department of Real Estate, School of Design and Environment, National University of Singapore, 10 Kent Ridge Crescent, Singapore 119260., rstnph{at}nus.edu.sg

Nai Jia Lee

Department of Real Estate, School of Design and Environment, National University of Singapore, 10 Kent Ridge Crescent, Singapore 119260., rstlnj{at}nus.edu.sg

Seow Eng Ong

Department of Real Estate, School of Design and Environment, National University of Singapore, 10 Kent Ridge Crescent, Singapore 119260. seong{at}nus.edu.sg

This paper provides a rigorous study on the change in Central Provident Fund (CPF) policy in Singapore on 1 September 2002, on household mobility in general and on the affordability and accessibility of potential home-buyers in particular. The change brought about increased accessibility but reduced affordability for home-buyers. The latter has an impact on the shortfall months which are positively related to changes in mortgage rate, mortgage term and property price and negatively related to the amount of CPF available for home purchases. Further, the low critical price that households can afford without experiencing any shortfall implies that the majority of public and private home-buyers will be affected by the policy change. Consequently, the improvement in accessibility by allowing the use of CPF for downpayment may stimulate demand at the cost of higher financial risk to home-buyers and mortgage lenders.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?