Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Butler, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 40, No. 12, 2469-2486 (2003)
DOI: 10.1080/0042098032000136165
© 2003 Urban Studies Journal Limited

Living in the Bubble: Gentrification and its 'Others' in North London

Tim Butler

Department of Geography, King's College, University of London, Strand, London WC2R 2LS, UK, tim.butler{at}kcl.ac. uk.

The article examines aspects of middle-class life by a group of 75 gentrifiers in Islington in north London. The study demonstrates that in their day-to-day lives almost all the respondents lived quite apart from non-middle-class residents in Islington. This was demonstrated by their educational strategies which involved finding schooling for their children out of the borough in both the private and state sectors. Their children had almost no contact with children from other social backgrounds. It is suggested that, despite a strong rhetoric in favour of social integration, the current gentrifiers of Islington, unlike the pioneers of the 1960s and 1970s, are unwilling to invest social capital in the area and that their relationships are almost entirely with 'people like us'. It is suggested that this is likely to lead to an increasingly polarised social structure in which the middle classes and their children inhabit entirely separate social spaces from other, and more disadvantaged, groups. The long-term consequences of this are uncertain but are unlikely to lead to greater social cohesion.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Urban StudHome page
J. R. Hipp and A. Perrin
Nested Loyalties: Local Networks' Effects on Neighbourhood and Community Cohesion
Urban Stud, December 1, 2006; 43(13): 2503 - 2523.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
L. McDowell, K. Ward, D. Perrons, K. Ray, and C. Fagan
Place, Class and Local Circuits of Reproduction: Exploring the Social Geography of Middle-class Childcare in London
Urban Stud, November 1, 2006; 43(12): 2163 - 2182.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
C. Young, M. Diep, and S. Drabble
Living with Difference? The 'Cosmopolitan City' and Urban Reimaging in Manchester, UK
Urban Stud, September 1, 2006; 43(10): 1687 - 1714.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
European Urban and Regional StudiesHome page
R. J. Hjorthol and T. Bjornskau
Gentrification in Norway: Capital, Culture or Convenience?
European Urban and Regional Studies, October 1, 2005; 12(4): 353 - 371.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban EducationHome page
D. Reay
Exclusivity, Exclusion, and Social Class in Urban Education Markets in the United Kingdom
Urban Education, September 1, 2004; 39(5): 537 - 560.
[Abstract] [PDF]