Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ball, M.
Right arrow Articles by Maginn, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 40, No. 11, 2239-2253 (2003)
DOI: 10.1080/0042098032000123277
© 2003 Urban Studies Journal Limited

Synergy in Urban Regeneration Partnerships: Property Agents' Perspectives

Michael Ball

Department of Real Estate and Planning, University of Reading, Whiteknights, PO Box 217, Reading, RG6 6AH, UK, M.Ball{at}readireg.ac.uk

Laurent Le Ny

Chargé de Mission INTERREG, Conseil Général de l'Aisne, Rue Paul Doumer, 02013 Laon Cedex, France

Paul J. Maginn

Centre for Social Research, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup Campus, 100 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, Western Australia 6027

A major justification for urban regeneration partnerships (URPs) is that they provide synergistic benefits for their participants. Some argue that the major beneficiaries will be private-sector agencies. This proposition is examined in the light of evidence from a survey of property-related agencies. The opinions of developers and property consultants on the success of the partnership process in regeneration schemes with a significant property redevelopment component are examined. Many were found to have concerns about the URP model, centring on governance structures, decision-making, cost implications and time-frames. This suggests that synergy benefits may not actually exist. It is concluded that management and decision-making structures in partnerships need to be of greater concern in policy debate than is currently the case.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Qualitative ResearchHome page
P. J. Maginn
Towards more effective community participation in urban regeneration: the potential of collaborative planning and applied ethnography
Qualitative Research, February 1, 2007; 7(1): 25 - 43.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
L. Hemphill, S. McGreal, J. Berry, and S. Watson
Leadership, Power and Multisector Urban Regeneration Partnerships
Urban Stud, January 1, 2006; 43(1): 59 - 80.
[Abstract] [PDF]