This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Garcia, D. Articles by Riera, P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Expansion versus Density in Barcelona: A Valuation Exercise

Departament d'Economia i Empresa, Universitat de les Illes Balears, 07071 Palma de Mallorca, Spain. dolores.garcia{at}uib.es

Pere Riera

Departament d'Economia Aplicada, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain. pere.riera{at}uab.es

This study provides an alternative empirical approach to identify optimal urban growth when accounting for its associated environmental effects. It is assumed that preserving outer landscapes and enjoying reduced density levels are inversely related, and so households must trade them off. The exercise analyses whether more disperse urban growth would be socially desirable in a particular area, the metropolitan region of Barcelona. A contingent valuation exercise using a double-bounded format was undertaken and an extended version of the spike model was used to estimate the willingness to pay of changing to a less dense urban path. The results show that a less compact scenario would be welfare-increasing in aggregate terms. It is suggested that general proposals on compacting cities should not necessarily constitute a desirable planning goal.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Neuman The Compact City Fallacy Journal of Planning Education and Research, September 1, 2005; 25(1): 11 - 26. [Abstract] [PDF]