Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Waley, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 39, No. 9, 1533-1550 (2002)
DOI: 10.1080/00420980220151646
© 2002 Urban Studies Journal Limited

Moving the Margins of Tokyo

Paul Waley

School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK, p.waley{at}geog.leeds.ac.uk

We make sense of urban space by investing it with names, names that over time accrue meanings both polyvalent at any one point in time and mutating through time. The extent and meanings of Shitamachi, one of Tokyo's central territorial concepts, have changed significantly throughout the city's history. In this paper, I first chart these changing meanings and then set the territory within the wider terrain of capital city as vehicle for the twin interests of state and capital. Urban space in Tokyo was used as a formative setting onto which to inscribe an idea of modernisation. Within this larger picture, Shitamachi was seen as representing a past vision of the city, one that was inimical to the interests of a modernising state. It became an industrial zone, a margin within the folds of central space. In recent years, a reassessment has occurred. Shitamachi is now widely celebrated as a space of communal memory and historical identity, even though its extent and meanings remain contested. The richly symbolic spaces of the imagination are thus rooted within a changing political economy.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?