This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Malecki, E. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Hard and Soft Networks for Urban Competitiveness

Department of Geography and the Center for Urban and Regional Analysis, Ohio State University, 1036 Derby Hall, 154 North Oval Mall, Columbus, OH 43210 1361, USA, malecki.4{at}osu.edu

The concept of competitiveness has grown significantly and it is now common for cities, regions and nations to assess, improve and publicise their competitive standing vis-à-vis other places. Yet it remains rather unclear just what competitiveness is when applied to places, which have objectives distinct from those of private-sector organisations, for whom share price and profitability serve as common metrics. The blurring of the responsibilities of the public and private sectors also complicates matters, with the former making increasing use of the terminology and priorities of business. This paper takes the view that both public and private sectors-and their interactions—are sustained by networks. To be effective, these networks must operate at the global, national, regional and local scales, gathering knowledge via social interaction—that is, through 'soft' networks. To a growing degree, competitive networking also demands technological capability, whether in high-tech sectors, `smokestack' industries or public-sector organisations. This capability now demands 'hard' networks that 'plug into' the Internet. Decisions about the location of this infrastructure are largely in the hands of the private sector, responding to agglomeration economies and other `imperatives' of the business world. The Internet also has created a new set of imperatives regarding information flow, since any competitive organisation must have an informative and 'user-friendly' website. Such new demands continue to 'raise the bar' regarding what urban competitiveness means.

Urban Studies, Vol. 39, No. 5-6, 929-945 (2002)
DOI: 10.1080/00420980220128381


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I. Daskalopoulou and A. Petrou Urban Tourism Competitiveness: Networks and the Regional Asset Base Urban Stud, April 1, 2009; 46(4): 779 - 801. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Eraydin, B. Armatli Koroglu, H. Erkus Ozturk, and S. Senem Yasar Network Governance for Competitiveness: The Role of Policy Networks in the Economic Performance of Settlements in the Izmir Region Urban Stud, October 1, 2008; 45(11): 2291 - 2321. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Eraydin The Impact of Globalisation on Different Social Groups: Competitiveness, Social Cohesion and Spatial Segregation in Istanbul Urban Stud, July 1, 2008; 45(8): 1663 - 1691. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Huggins, A. Johnston, and R. Steffenson Universities, knowledge networks and regional policy Cambridge J Regions Econ Soc, July 1, 2008; 1(2): 321 - 340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Boland Unpacking the Theory-Policy Interface of Local Economic Development: An Analysis of Cardiff and Liverpool Urban Stud, May 1, 2007; 44(5-6): 1019 - 1039. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Bristow Everyone's a 'winner': problematising the discourse of regional competitiveness J. Econ. Geogr., June 1, 2005; 5(3): 285 - 304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]