Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wichmann Matthiessen, C.
Right arrow Articles by Find, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 39, No. 5-6, 903-927 (2002)
DOI: 10.1080/00420980220128372
© 2002 Urban Studies Journal Limited

The Top-level Global Research System, 1997-99: Centres, Networks and Nodality. An Analysis Based on Bibliometric Indicators

Christian Wichmann Matthiessen

Institute of Geography, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 10, 1350 Copenhagen K, Denmark, cwm{at}geogr.ku.dk

Annette Winkel Schwarz

Technical Knowledge Centre of Denmark, Postbox 777, 2800 Lyngby, Denmark, aws{at}dtv.dk

Søren Find

Technical Knowledge Centre of Denmark, Postbox 777, 2800 Lyngby, Denmark, sf{at}dtv.dk

The importance of the knowledge-base in regional and urban competition is generally recognised, although causal relations between urban and regional economic growth and knowledge level are far from clear. This paper presents the first analysis of the strength, interrelations and nodality of the global research centres. The data are records in the Science Catation Index 1997-99 of papers produced by authors from the 40 largest `greater' urban regions of the world as measured by research output. The network of research co-operation depends on nationality, distance and other factors. The top-level nodes in the co-operation network of the world are London, Geneve-Lausanne and the San Francisco Bay Area. In absolute number of co-authored papers, Los Angeles, Boston and New York constitute a second level and, when observed links are related to expected links, the second level combines Amsterdam-Hague-Rotterdam-Utrecht, Paris, Basel-Mulhouse-Freiburg and Copenhagen-Lund. As expected, the networks of citation are, by contrast, very independent of distance, but not of nationality. The primary categories of research centres for the total number of citings presented are San Diego, Seattle, Boston, New York and the San Francisco Bay Area. When we turn to the international data-set, it is Mannheim-Heidelberg, Geneve-Lausanne, Basel-Mulhouse-Freiburg and Cambridge which are in the lead.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American Journal of EvaluationHome page
J. M. Diaz-Puente, A. Cazorla, and A. Dorrego
Crossing National, Continental, and Linguistic Boundaries: Toward a Worldwide Evaluation Research Community in Journals of Evaluation
American Journal of Evaluation, December 1, 2007; 28(4): 399 - 415.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Prog Hum GeogrHome page
E. J. Malecki and M. C. Ewers
Labor migration to world cities: with a research agenda for the Arab Gulf
Progress in Human Geography, August 1, 2007; 31(4): 467 - 484.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
W. van Winden, L. van den Berg, and P. Pol
European Cities in the Knowledge Economy: Towards a Typology
Urban Stud, March 1, 2007; 44(3): 525 - 549.
[Abstract] [PDF]