This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dunse, N. Articles by Watkins, C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Testing for the Existence of Office Sub-markets: A Comparison of Evidence from Two Cities

Department of Land Economy, University of Aberdeen, Kings College, Aberdeen, AB14 3UF, UK, n.a.dunse{at}abdn.ac.uk

Chris Leishman

Department of Building Engineering and Surveying, Heriot-Watt University, Riccarton, Edinburgh, EH144AS, UK, c.m.leishman @hw.ac.uk

Craig Watkins

Department of Land Economy, University of Aberdeen, Kings College, Aberdeen, AB14 3UF, UK, c.watkins{at}abdn.ac.uk

Most conceptual and applied economic models of the structure of urban office markets have been developed from traditional location theory. In their basic form, these models tend to posit a trade-off between accessibility and space. In the light of changing business practices and decentralisation, however, some authors have noted that the influence of agglomeration economies on the locational dynamics of commercial property markets may be declining. In this paper, we seek to undertake an indirect test of the power of intraurban office location theory. The paper is developed in two stages. In the first part, we examine the theoretical case for the existence of sub-markets in urban office markets and outline the implications of sub-market existence for traditional office location theory. In the second part of the paper, using data from Edinburgh and Glasgow, we undertake empirical tests for sub-market existence. A comparison of the results from the two city markets provides limited evidence of the existence of spatial sub-markets and suggests that markets might take different spatial forms depending on the urban context. The paper concludes by highlighting the need to account for the complex structure of urban property markets in developing models for property appraisal, taxation and land use planning purposes.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Y. C. Tse and J. R. Webb Models of Office Market Dynamics Urban Stud, January 1, 2003; 40(1): 71 - 89. [Abstract] [PDF]