Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, H.W.
Right arrow Articles by Wood, A.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 39, No. 3, 457-481 (2002)
DOI: 10.1080/00420980220112784

The Evaluation of Community Economic Development Initiatives

H.W. Armstrong

Department of Geography, University of Sheffield, Winter Street, Sheffield, S102TN, UK, H.Armstrong@shef field.ac.uk

B. Kehrer

Department of Geography, University of Sheffield, Winter Street, Sheffield, S102TN, UK, ggp97bk@shef field.ac.uk

P. Wells

Policy Research Institute, Leeds Metropolitan University, Bronte Hall, Beckett Park Campus, Leeds, LS63QS, UK, pri{at}lum.ac.uk

A.M. Wood

Department of Geography, University of Oklahoma, 100 East Boyd Street, Norman, OK 73019 1007, USA, amwood{at}ou.edu

Community economic development (CED) initiatives expanded rapidly in urban and regional policy in the 1990s. Traditional evaluation methodology has, however, proved to be extremely difficult to apply effectively to CED. This paper examines existing monitoring and evaluation procedures for CED, the problems faced in applying traditional methodology and possible ways forward to ensure that more effective monitoring and evaluation can be undertaken. Evidence is drawn from four detailed case studies of urban CED projects funded as part of the 1994-96 Yorkshire and the Humber Objective 2 Structural Funds programme. These case studies were deliberately designed to experiment with alternative quantitative and qualitative evaluation methods.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
COMMUNITY DEV JHome page
J. Lo and G. Halseth
The practice of principles: an examination of CED groups in Vancouver, BC
Community Dev. J., July 30, 2007; (2007) bsm029v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]