Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Turner, B.
Right arrow Articles by Whitehead, C. M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 39, No. 2, 201-217 (2002)
DOI: 10.1080/00420980120102920
© 2002 Urban Studies Journal Limited

Reducing Housing Subsidy: Swedish Housing Policy in an International Context

Bengt Turner

Institute for Housing Research, Uppsala University, Box 785, 80129 Gävle, Sweden, Bengt Turner{at}IBF.UU.SE

Christine M. E. Whitehead

Department of Economics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, UK, c.m.e.whitehead{at}lse.ac.uk

Swedish housing policy was dramatically changed during the 1990s. A traditional formally tenure-neutral and generous subsidy system has been replaced by much lower levels of assistance, more directed at lower-income households and depressed areas. This paper sets the Swedish policy in an international context as part of a much more general pattern of reduced and rebalanced expenditures associated with liberalisation and the transfer of risk. The paper then addresses the direct and indirect impacts of the Swedish 'grand restructuring', concentrating on the extent of the cutbacks; rents and prices; levels of output; and the potential for increased segregation. The evidence suggests that the policy changes, together with their effect on expectations, significantly modified the housing system. They reduced demand for new building, particularly in less-pressured areas; increased vacancies, especially in the social sector; transferred risk to both the social and private sectors; and increased outcome differentials between the well-off and those with fewer resources—both in terms of individuals and areas. The analysis presented here provides evidence against which the Swedish policy can begin to be evaluated. It also suggests lessons for other industrialised economies that are addressing similar issues.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?