Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paez, A.
Right arrow Articles by Miyamoto, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 38, No. 9, 1493-1508 (2001)
DOI: 10.1080/00420980126668
© 2001 Urban Studies Journal Limited

Spatial Association and Heterogeneity Issues in Land Price Models

Antonio Paez

Laboratory for Regional Planning and Applications, Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, Aoba 06, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8579, Japan, antonio{at}rs.civil.tohoku.ac.jp

Takashi Uchida

Laboratory for Regional Planning and Applications, Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, Aoba 06, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8579, Japan, uchida{at}plan.civil.tohoku.ac. jp

Kazuaki Miyamoto

Socioeconomic Studies and the Centre for Northeast Asian Studies, Tohoku University, Kawauchi, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8576, Japan, miyamoto{at}plan.civil.tohoku.ac.jp

Urban planners frequently use regression analysis for the empirical estimation of land price models, which are used to investigate the spatial structure of a city or to calculate the implicit price of environmental characteristics. A concern with this kind of analysis is that often spatially associated or heterogeneous data are used, which leads to estimation pitfalls, most notably spatial autocorrelation and model structural instability over space. In this paper, we introduce a modelling methodology that combines a spatial autoregression with a switching regression to incorporate effectively both association and heterogeneity as part of the analysis. In addition, using Sendai City in north-eastern Japan as a case study, we use local statistics of spatial association to assist us in the exploration and definition of heterogeneous regimes. Finally, we show how some measures commonly used to counter spatial effects fail at times, thus highlighting the importance of a spatial modelling methodology such as the one presented here.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Urban StudHome page
A. Paez, Fei Long, and S. Farber
Moving Window Approaches for Hedonic Price Estimation: An Empirical Comparison of Modelling Techniques
Urban Stud, July 1, 2008; 45(8): 1565 - 1581.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
R. Guillain, J. Le Gallo, and C. Boiteux-Orain
Changes in Spatial and Sectoral Patterns of Employment in Ile-de-France, 1978-97
Urban Stud, October 1, 2006; 43(11): 2075 - 2098.
[Abstract] [PDF]