Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Varady, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, X.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 38, No. 8, 1273-1304 (2001)
DOI: 10.1080/00420980124918
© 2001 Urban Studies Journal Limited

Voucher Recipient Achievement of Improved Housing Conditions in the US: Do Moving Distance and Relocation Services Matter?

David P. Varady

School of Planning, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221, USA, david.varady{at}uc.edu

Carole C. Walker

Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 33 Livingston Avenue, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901-1982, USA, cawalker{at}rci.rutgers.edu

Xinhao Wang

School of Planning, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221, USA, xinhao.wang{at}uc.edu.

When householders are vouchered-out from distressed, federally subsidised private developments in the US and receive moderate relocation counselling, does that counselling lead to a more intensive housing search, longer-distance moves and higher levels of housing satisfaction ? Multiple regression analysis was applied to a data-set containing survey and geographical information (for example, distance moved, median neighbourhood income level) for 201 voucher recipients in 4 cities. The analysis was used to determine if the use of relocation counselling services (as well as the type of services utilised) and distance moved helped to explain variations in housing satisfaction. Those who used counselling services were in fact more likely to be satisfied with their new home than were those who were unaware of these services. However, those who were aware of the services but did not use them fared as well as householders who used them. Counselling to help in dealings with landlords was the most influential type of relocation assistance vas à vis housing satisfaction. The distance householders moved played an insignificant role in the analysis. This finding undoubtedly reflects the fact that voucher recipients sought to remain in or close to their original neighbourhood to be near friends and relatives and familiar bus lines, and the fact that better housing units offering a greater sense of safety were available in the same neighbourhood or in neighbourhoods adjacent to the vouchered-out development. Implications for HUD's vouchering-out policy are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
D. P. Varady and C. C. Walker
Using Housing Vouchers to Move to the Suburbs: The Alameda County, California, Experience
Urban Affairs Review, November 1, 2003; 39(2): 143 - 180.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning LiteratureHome page
D. P. Varady and C. C. Walker
Housing Vouchers and Residential Mobility
Journal of Planning Literature, August 1, 2003; 18(1): 17 - 30.
[Abstract] [PDF]