Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Urban Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bailey, N.
Right arrow Articles by Turok, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Central Scotland as a Polycentric Urban Region: Useful Planning Concept or Chimera?

Nick Bailey

Department of Urban Studies, University of Glasgow, 25 Bute Gardens, Glasgow, G12 8RS, UK, N.Bailey{at}socsci.gla.ac.uk

Ivan Turok

Department of Urban Studies, University of Glasgow, 25 Bute Gardens, Glasgow, G12 8RS, UK, LTurok{at}socsci.gla.ac.uk

Interest in the concept of the polycentric urban region (PUR) has been growing among planners and policy-makers in north-west Europe. PURs are believed to offer a means of promoting regional economic competitiveness while safeguarding environmental objectives. This paper interrogates the concept and examines its relevance to the central Scotland region. Central Scotland has a polycentric physical form, but the evidence that it is a single functional region in economic terms is much more mixed. The dominant pattern of interactions suggests two separate city-regions, although links between adjoining areas seem to be growing. Despite considerable rivalry between public organisations across the region, there appears to be increasing support for the development of some kind of strategic spatial framework to inform key investment decisions and to promote closer collaboration. This would not necessarily be based on the PUR concept, since it is too broadly specified at present to guide the kinds of decision that need to be made. Further work is needed to elaborate and refine the concept.

Urban Studies, Vol. 38, No. 4, 697-715 (2001)
DOI: 10.1080/00420980120035295
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Urban StudHome page
E. Meijers
Summing Small Cities Does Not Make a Large City: Polycentric Urban Regions and the Provision of Cultural, Leisure and Sports Amenities
Urban Stud, October 1, 2008; 45(11): 2323 - 2342.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Urban StudHome page
l. Deas and A. Lord
From a New Regionalism to an Unusual Regionalism? The Emergence of Non-standard Regional Spaces and Lessons for the Territorial Reorganisation of the State
Urban Stud, September 1, 2006; 43(10): 1847 - 1877.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Urban StudHome page
E. Meijers
Polycentric Urban Regions and the Quest for Synergy: Is a Network of Cities More than the Sum of the Parts?
Urban Stud, April 1, 2005; 42(4): 765 - 781.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 European Urban and Regional StudiesHome page
E. Meijers and A. Romein
Realizing Potential: Building Regional Organizing Capacity in Polycentric Urban Regions
European Urban and Regional Studies, April 1, 2003; 10(2): 173 - 186.
[Abstract] [PDF]