Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Atkinson, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kintrea, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 38, No. 12, 2277-2298 (2001)
DOI: 10.1080/00420980120087162
© 2001 Urban Studies Journal Limited

Disentangling Area Effects: Evidence from Deprived and Non-deprived Neighbourhoods

Rowland Atkinson

Department of Urban Studies, University of Glasgow, 25 Bute Gardens, Glasgow, G12 8RS, UK, r.atkinson{at}socsci.gla.ac.uk

Keith Kintrea

Department of Urban Studies, University of Glasgow, 25 Bute Gardens, Glasgow, G12 8RS, UK, k.kintrea{at}socsci.glaac.uk

This paper focuses on the question of whether it is worse to be poor in a poor area or in an area which is more socially mixed; in short, does living in a deprived area compound the disadvantage experienced by its residents, and do area effects contribute to social exclusion? The idea of social areas having direct or mediated effects on the lives of their residents continues to interest and challenge academic and policy debates on the effect of concentrated poverty and on the creation of more mixed and, thereby, more sustainable neighbourhood forms. However, area effects remain contentious and British research evidence is scant. Following a review of the theoretical and empirical understandings of the relationship between households and neighbourhoods, the paper presents survey data from a comparative study of deprived and socially mixed neighbourhoods in Glasgow and Edinburgh. These data provide evidence that supports the area effects thesis, in particular in relation to area reputation and employment. The paper concludes that, with certain caveats, living in areas of geographically concentrated poverty creates additional problems for residents.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Urban StudHome page
S. Musterd
Residents' Views on Social Mix: Social Mix, Social Networks and Stigmatisation in Post-war Housing Estates in Europe
Urban Stud, April 1, 2008; 45(4): 897 - 915.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J ECON GEOGRHome page
A. Bolster, S. Burgess, R. Johnston, K. Jones, C. Propper, and R. Sarker
Neighbourhoods, households and income dynamics: a semi-parametric investigation of neighbourhood effects
J. Econ. Geogr., January 1, 2007; 7(1): 1 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
S. Musterd and R. Andersson
Housing Mix, Social Mix, and Social Opportunities
Urban Affairs Review, July 1, 2005; 40(6): 761 - 790.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
SociologyHome page
R. Atkinson and K. Kintrea
'Opportunities and Despair, it's all in there': Practitioner Experiences and Explanations of Area Effects and Life Chances
Sociology, July 1, 2004; 38(3): 437 - 455.
[Abstract] [PDF]