Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buck, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 38, No. 12, 2251-2275 (2001)
DOI: 10.1080/00420980120087153
© 2001 Urban Studies Journal Limited

Identifying Neighbourhood Effects on Social Exclusion

Nick Buck

Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, Essex, CO4 3SQ, UK, nhb{at}essex.ac.uk

Interest in the influence of the neighbourhood on the life-chances of individuals has been increasing. However, methodological problems in identifying causal models of these influences suggest the need for caution in such inference. This paper uses data from the British Household Panel Study linked to local area characteristics to explore how far there is evidence that outcomes associated with social exclusion (non-monetary poverty measures, measures of labour market engagement, entry into jobs and flows in and out of poverty) may be associated with neighbourhood characteristics. The paper finds significant associations even when controlling for a substantial range of individual characteristics. There is also limited evidence of a non-linear effect with worse outcomes in the very worst areas for at least one measure. Analysis of the spatial scale of associations suggests mixed results, with stronger associations at the most local scales for some but not all outcomes.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Urban StudHome page
G. Bolt, R. van Kempen, and M. van Ham
Minority Ethnic Groups in the Dutch Housing Market: Spatial Segregation, Relocation Dynamics and Housing Policy
Urban Stud, June 1, 2008; 45(7): 1359 - 1384.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
S. Baum, A. Bill, and W. Mitchell
Labour Underutilisation in Metropolitan Labour Markets in Australia: Individual Characteristics, Personal Circumstances and Local Labour Markets
Urban Stud, May 1, 2008; 45(5-6): 1193 - 1216.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
European Journal of CriminologyHome page
F. Estrada and A. Nilsson
Segregation and Victimization: Neighbourhood Resources, Individual Risk Factors and Exposure to Property Crime
European Journal of Criminology, April 1, 2008; 5(2): 193 - 216.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Policy and AdministrationHome page
J. Coaffee and I. Deas
The Search for Policy Innovation in Urban Governance: Lessons from Community-led Regeneration Partnerships
Public Policy and Administration, April 1, 2008; 23(2): 167 - 187.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J ECON GEOGRHome page
A. Bolster, S. Burgess, R. Johnston, K. Jones, C. Propper, and R. Sarker
Neighbourhoods, households and income dynamics: a semi-parametric investigation of neighbourhood effects
J. Econ. Geogr., January 1, 2007; 7(1): 1 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
S. Musterd and R. Andersson
Housing Mix, Social Mix, and Social Opportunities
Urban Affairs Review, July 1, 2005; 40(6): 761 - 790.
[Abstract] [PDF]