Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Forrest, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kearns, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 38, No. 12, 2125-2143 (2001)
DOI: 10.1080/00420980120087081
© 2001 Urban Studies Journal Limited

Social Cohesion, Social Capital and the Neighbourhood

Ray Forrest

School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, 8 Priory Road, Bristol, BS84TB, UK, R.Forrest{at}bristol.ac.uk

Ade Kearns

Department of Urban Studies, University of Glasgow, 25 Bute Gardens, Glasgow, G128RS, UK, A.J.Kearns{at}socsci.gla.ac.uk

In current theoretical and policy debates concerning social cohesion, the neighbourhood has re-emerged as an important setting for many of the processes which supposedly shape social identity and life-chances. It is in this context of a renewal of interest in local social relations and particularly the deployment of notions of social capital that this paper offers a critical review of a wide-ranging literature. The paper explores initially and briefly the idea that societies face a new crisis of social cohesion and outlines the key dimensions of societal cohesion. The core of the paper is then devoted to an examination of where the contemporary residential neighbourhood fits into these wider debates, particularly in relation to the interaction between social cohesion and social capital. In this context, some of the key debates around the concept of social capital are outlined. In moving beyond abstraction, the paper also shows how social capital can be broken down into relevant domains for policy action at the neighbourhood level and how concepts such as social cohesion and social capital can be operationalised for research purposes.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
COMMUNITY DEV JHome page
L. Kemp, R. Chavez, B. Harris-Roxas, and N. Burton
What's in the box? Issues in evaluating interventions to develop strong and open communities
Community Dev. J., June 5, 2007; (2007) bsm014v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Environment and BehaviorHome page
L. M. Funk, D. E. Allan, and N. L. Chappell
Testing the Relationship Between Involvement and Perceived Neighborhood Safety: A Multinomial Logit Approach
Environment and Behavior, May 1, 2007; 39(3): 332 - 351.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Critical Social PolicyHome page
P. H. Cheong, R. Edwards, H. Goulbourne, and J. Solomos
Immigration, social cohesion and social capital: A critical review
Critical Social Policy, February 1, 2007; 27(1): 24 - 49.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Sociol RevHome page
B. Volker, H. Flap, and S. Lindenberg
When Are Neighbourhoods Communities? Community in Dutch Neighbourhoods
Eur. Sociol. Rev., February 1, 2007; 23(1): 99 - 114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
J. Carpenter
Addressing Europe's Urban Challenges: Lessons from the EU URBAN Community Initiative
Urban Stud, November 1, 2006; 43(12): 2145 - 2162.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
E. E. Brown and F. Brooks
African American and Latino Perceptions of Cohesion in a Multiethnic Neighborhood
American Behavioral Scientist, October 1, 2006; 50(2): 258 - 275.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
B. Yuen
Reclaiming Cultural Heritage in Singapore
Urban Affairs Review, July 1, 2006; 41(6): 830 - 854.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Acta SociologicaHome page
O. Seippel
Sport and Social Capital
Acta Sociologica, June 1, 2006; 49(2): 169 - 183.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
A. Crawford
'Fixing Broken Promises?': Neighbourhood Wardens and Social Capital
Urban Stud, May 1, 2006; 43(5-6): 957 - 976.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
T. Brannan, P. John, and G. Stoker
Active Citizenship and Effective Public Services and Programmes: How Can We Know What Really Works?
Urban Stud, May 1, 2006; 43(5-6): 993 - 1008.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
P. Kennett and R. Forrest
The Neighbourhood in a European Context
Urban Stud, April 1, 2006; 43(4): 713 - 718.
[PDF]


Home page
Education, Citizenship and Social JusticeHome page
R. Basu
Multiethnic neighbourhoods as sites of social capital formation: Examining social to political 'integration' in schools
Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, March 1, 2006; 1(1): 59 - 82.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
SociologyHome page
R. MacDonald, T. Shildrick, C. Webster, and D. Simpson
Growing Up in Poor Neighbourhoods: The Significance of Class and Place in the Extended Transitions of 'Socially Excluded'Young Adults
Sociology, December 1, 2005; 39(5): 873 - 891.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Critical Social PolicyHome page
C. Worley
'It's not about race. It's about the community': New Labour and 'community cohesion'
Critical Social Policy, November 1, 2005; 25(4): 483 - 496.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
P Martikainen, T M Kauppinen, and T Valkonen
Effects of the characteristics of neighbourhoods and the characteristics of people on cause specific mortality: a register based follow up study of 252 000 men
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, March 1, 2003; 57(3): 210 - 217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]