Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Galster, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 38, No. 12, 2111-2124 (2001)
DOI: 10.1080/00420980120087072
© 2001 Urban Studies Journal Limited

On the Nature of Neighbourhood

George Galster

College of Urban, Labor and Metropolitan Affairs, Wayne State University, Room 3198, F/AB, Detroit, MI 48202, USA, George_Galster{at}Wayne.edu

The paper advances the conceptualisation of neighbourhood by specifying it as a bundle of spatially based attributes associated with clusters of residences, sometimes in conjunction with other land uses. There follows a discussion of how this 'composite commodity' definition relates to the planning challenge of spatially bounding neighbourhood. The paper then probes the myriad idiosyncrasies associated with the concept of neighbourhood: cross-attribute variation in durability and ability to be priced, relativistic evaluations of attributes and consumption impacts on attributes. It discusses how, within this new paradigmatic context, neighbourhoods are produced by the same actors that consume them: households, property owners, business people and local government. Finally, consideration is given to various aspects of the origins and nature of neighbourhood change and it is argued that neighbourhood dynamics are rife with social inefficiencies.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
M. Riva, L. Gauvin, and T. A Barnett
Toward the next generation of research into small area effects on health: a synthesis of multilevel investigations published since July 1998
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, October 1, 2007; 61(10): 853 - 861.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HEALTH PROMOT INTHome page
M. Riva, L. Gauvin, and L. Richard
Use of local area facilities for involvement in physical activity in Canada: insights for developing environmental and policy interventions
Health Promot. Int., September 1, 2007; 22(3): 227 - 235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
L. K. Bates
Does Neighborhood Really Matter?: Comparing Historically Defined Neighborhood Boundaries with Housing Submarkets
Journal of Planning Education and Research, September 1, 2006; 26(1): 5 - 17.
[Abstract] [PDF]