Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Galster, G.
Right arrow Articles by Zimmermann, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 38, No. 1, 141-156 (2001)
DOI: 10.1080/00420980125481
© 2001 Urban Studies Journal Limited

Testing for Discrimination in Home Insurance: Results from New York City and Phoenix

George Galster

College of Urban, Labor, and Metropolitan Affairs, F/AB Room 3198, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA, George_Galster{at}wayne.edu

Douglas Wissoker

The Urban Institute, 2100 M Street NW, Washington DC20037, USA, dwissoke{at}ui.urban.org

Wendy Zimmermann

The Urban Institute, 2100 M Street NW, Washington DC20037, USA, Wzimmerm{at}ui.urbanorg

This paper examines the results of a paired testing study of neighbourhood-based discrimination in the provision of quotes for home insurance in New York City and Phoenix, Arizona. We examine whether agents treated insurance-seekers buying their first homes in moderate-income, predominantly black or Hispanic-occupied neighbourhoods differently from insurance-seekers in comparable predominantly white neighbourhoods. The study examines differences in whether a quote is provided, the type of insurance and policy options offered and the premium quoted. Overall, of 10 key measures (5 for each city), only 1 (optional replacement cost coverage on personal property in Phoenix) showed a statistically significant difference consistent with discrimination. Testers in Hispanic neighbourhoods of Phoenix were quoted premiums 12 per cent higher than those offered to testers in white neighbourhoods. This difference, however, is in line with the price schedules for the state-approved rating territories in which the white and Hispanic homes were located.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am Law Econ RevHome page
S. L. Ross and J. Yinger
Uncovering Discrimination: A Comparison of the Methods Used by Scholars and Civil Rights Enforcement Officials
Am. Law Econ. Rev., September 1, 2006; 8(3): 562 - 614.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
G. D. Squires and J. Chadwick
Linguistic Profiling: A Continuing Tradition of Discrimination in the Home Insurance Industry?
Urban Affairs Review, January 1, 2006; 41(3): 400 - 415.
[Abstract] [PDF]