This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by North, P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Is There Space for Organisation from Below within the UK Government's Action Zones? A Test of 'Collaborative Planning'

Local Economy Policy Unit, South Bank University, 202 Wandsworth Road, London, SW8 2JZ, UK, Northp{at}sbu.ac.uk

The institutional structure and urban policy preferences of the Blair administration have now emerged from the British government's comprehensive spending review. In a series of recent publications, notably from the Department of Transport, Environment and the Regions (DETR) and the Social Exclusion Unit (SEU) report Bringing Britain Together, the government places a welcome emphasis on the importance of working with communities and in community economic development. Unfortunately though, these initiatives contrast with a simultaneous commitment to fiscal restraint and work-based labour market policies, which seem to mark continuity. The extent to which the urban policy agenda and institutions are open to influence from community organisations promoting social justice claims that differ from those of government is therefore unclear. This paper uses Healey's 'collaborative planning' approach to explore the potential for the engagement of one such community organisation, Local Exchange Trading Schemes (LETS), to test the extent to which the new policy institutions are open to influence 'from below'.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Ansell and A. Gash Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., November 13, 2007; (2007) mum032v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Coaffee 'Shock of the New': Complexity and Emerging Rationales for Partnership Working Public Policy and Administration, July 1, 2005; 20(3): 23 - 41. [Abstract] [PDF]