Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Conway, M.
Right arrow Articles by Konvitz, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 37, No. 4, 749-774 (2000)
DOI: 10.1080/00420980050004008

Meeting the Challenge of Distressed Urban Areas

Maureen Conway

Aspen Institute, 1 Dupont Circle (Suite 700) Washington, DC 20036, USA,

Josef Konvitz

Territorial Development Policies and Prospects Division, OECD, 2 rue André Pascal, 75775 Paris Cedex 16, France, josef.konvitz{at}oecd.org

The emergence of distressed urban areas in the 1990s was unexpected. Governments have reacted with a series of policy initiatives which have increasingly focused on area-based strategies, partnerships and the formulation of a metropolitan vision. The scale of the problem-up to 20 per cent of the total population may live in distressed urban areas—and the complexity of causes are two factors which have complicated the design and implementation of policy. Better indicators are needed, especially to check the tendency towards a rhetoric of polarisation which makes the problems appear impossible to solve. A recent OECD study and a study of partnerships undertaken by the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (EFILWC) call attention to the importance of local participation and of business and labour in local strategies for regeneration. To compare experiences and analyses their policy implications, the OECD and the EFILWC organised a conference in Dublin in 1998, of which this paper is an analytical report. One of the findings of the conference deserving further study concerns the role of the media in shaping public opinion on regeneration issues; another concerns the need for preventive strategies and policies; and a third concerns the linkages between regeneration, education and job training and employment. There is a need for policy-makers and academic researchers to work towards a common agenda and a shared discourse. In the final analysis, the study of distressed areas can reveal much about the nature of larger urban economic and social processes. But the responsibility of government to act means making some informed judgement about how to intervene, and why intervention is necessary, even on the basis of imperfect information.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?