Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Child Hill, R.
Right arrow Articles by Fujita, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 37, No. 4, 673-690 (2000)
DOI: 10.1080/00420980050003964
© 2000 Urban Studies Journal Limited

State Restructuring and Local Power in Japan

Richard Child Hill

Department of Sociology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48823, USA, hillrr{at}pilot.msu.edu

Kuniko Fujita

Department of Sociology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48823, USA, fujitaku{at}pilot.msu.edu

Western understanding of the post-war evolution of states in advanced capitalist societies envisions a moment of fundamental transition beginning in the mid 1970s and indexed by reduced government spending, the privatisation of public services and increased inequality among local governments. Regulation theory sees the process as a transition from a Keynesian welfare state to a Schumpeterian workfare state necessitated by the shift from a Fordist to a post-Fordist regime of capital accumulation. Japan, a member of the OECD, and the world's second-largest economy, fits neither the political-economic trends nor the model put forward by Western regulation theorists. Japan has not experienced the decline in state spending, the privatisation of public activity or the rising inequality among local governments that characterises Western OECD nations. The Japanese have selectively incorporated Keynesian and Schumpeterian ideas, but in a spirit much closer to that of writers associated with the German historical school, and always within a framework rooted in Japan's own historical traditions and exigencies. We document Japan's departure from the Western model of state restructuring and explore the theoretical implications.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Urban StudHome page
A. Saito and A. Thornley
Shifts in Tokyo's World City Status and the Urban Planning Response
Urban Stud, April 1, 2003; 40(4): 665 - 685.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
R. Child Hill and J. W. Kim
Global Cities and Developmental States: New York, Tokyo and Seoul
Urban Stud, November 1, 2000; 37(12): 2167 - 2195.
[Abstract] [PDF]